Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Biweekly Shoot Out

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 20, 2007, 4:02 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Alan T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chester, UK
Posts: 2,980
Default

I know I've already had my two posts for today, but I'd like to ask, if I may,for clarification over cropping before we get any further into the fortnight. Cal has asked to see how images look in the standard formats 6x4 and 10x8.

When I turn my camera round, it's because I'm looking for a vertical format, and more often than not I know I'm going to crop it before I take it. I'm feeling constrained by the format. I'd respectfully point out that many of us were brought up on 24x36mm, 1:1.5 format. Or even, in my case, a very cheap plastic Lubiteltwin lens reflex, two-and-a quarter-inch square roll-film camera, whence you'd invariably crop.

Many of our cameras offer 1:1.5 (as 3:2), but surely no-one serious uses it, because it merely involves throwing away pixels you might want later. So we're stuck with 4:3, which stems from a convenient manufacturing size of vacuum vessels for TVs in the 1950s. The pleasing 'golden mean' is 1 : 1.618. "10x8" is 1:1.25, 25% different from square when the golden mean is 62% different from square.

By way of illustration here is how constrained I was in Castle Rushen, Isle of Man, last Easter. On the left is a resized whole frame, 3 of which I 'autostitched' (http://www.autostitch.net ) straight into the undoubtedly vertical (1:2.3) format image on the right. (Son & wife at top, dummies at bottom and behind camera.)

Craving indulgence, Alan T

BTW, this could have been done in the camera, of course, in panorama mode. Would that be ethical? It involves seeing the image in the viewfinder (in wide-angle or in pieces), and adjusting the camera to capture it. One adjustment happens to be moving the camera (cf panning a moving vehicle).


Attached Images
 
Alan T is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jun 20, 2007, 7:39 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,885
Default

Excellent points, Alan. Thanks for bringing them up. Cropping is acceptable in this forum and I appreciate the fact that you let us know when you have cropped or stitched. I say if it is kept vertical and rectangular in shape, go for it.


vsch1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 20, 2007, 5:31 PM   #3
Moderator
 
calr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 8,466
Default

Alan,
When I commented on your other excellent photo and stated that I though it could be a little wider, I was not stating any "rules" or even suggesting rules. I was merely stating an opinion that I thought one of the common aspect ratios might be better. I completely overlooked the fact that common aspect ratios in your country are probably different from the US. I appologize for that.

I don't recall if you said that was a stitched vertical panorama. If you did, I missed it. A panorama is an exception from my previous statements. Panoramas generally don't follow any particular rule as for size and aspect ratio.

The bottom line is, I like your photo of the trees reflected in the water but I would like to see it a bit wider. That is my personal opinion.

I have intentionally not commented on the two photos posted in this thread since I think they were posted to illustrate a point and not for the challenge.

Cal

(edit) Now I am really getting myself into trouble. It was the railroad photo where I mentioned the common aspect ratios, not the reflection photo.

calr is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:16 AM.