Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Biweekly Shoot Out

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 30, 2005, 5:02 AM   #1
Moderator
 
selvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,204
Default

Here are several night shots taken from about the same spot two years apart using different cameras and settings. The second shot is about twice as long an exposure with slightly smaller f-stop. The benefits of the anti-shake in the A200 are obvious, it is much sharper than the UZ720 shot. One could also argue I guess that I was more careful in the second shot but folks I'm trying to justify the extra cost of the A200 and the anti-shake. Both shots used manual white balance set at incandescent.

The first was taken several years ago with an Olympus UZ720: This is the EXIF info

Date/Time
23-Jun-2003 17:27:31

Minolta Model DiMAGE S404
Flash Used No
Focal Length 9.8 mm
Exposure Time 1/11 sec
Aperture f/3.6
ISO Equivalent 200
White Balance incandescent (3)
Metering Mode matrix (5)
Exposure Program manual (1)





An encore taken a a few days back using Minolta A200 with the following EXIF

Date/Time
19-Jun-2005 17:18:49
Konica-Minolta Model DiMAGE A200
Flash Used No
Focal Length 7.7 mm
Exposure Time 1/4 sec
Aperture f/4
ISO Equivalent 50
White Balance incandescent (3)
Metering Mode matrix (5)
JPEG Quality (6)
Exposure Program manual (1)

And now the photo



selvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jun 30, 2005, 10:43 AM   #2
Moderator
 
calr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 8,466
Default

Hi Selvin,
I have sat here flipping back and forth between these two photos comparing them. The difference in exposure settings doesn't account for all the differences between the two shots. In the second one, there is obviously some supplementary lighting from a floodlight or streetlight that is not present in the first. The second shot shows the Alamo much better but the first has a more eerie and ghostly feeling to it. I think I like both equally well.

Cal

calr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2005, 11:26 AM   #3
Mag
Senior Member
 
Mag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 734
Default

Both nice night shots selvin, I favor the 2nd a little bit more though, i like the windows and softer glow of the tower.

Best regards,

Mag
Mag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2005, 4:35 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
arunpd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 180
Default

Somehow I Like the nightly feeling that the first one gives...the second one is good from arhitechtural perspective..
arunpd is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:19 AM.