Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon EOS dSLR

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 13, 2003, 9:01 AM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 11
Default Anyone explain this ?

:?: Whilst waiting for the total luna eclipse the other night I decide to try
out my 10D at 1600 ISO. I took an image of a white van under a sodium
streetlight. When you split the image into RGB, in PSP, you get a red and
green channel image and no blue detail, as expected from a sodium
streetlight BUT if you brighten the blue channel and contrast stretch it you
get an image that appears inverted. Is it IR it is recording ?.

Original, RGB and Blue enhanced at www.knighttrain.freeserve.co.uk/1600.htm
Dylan is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 14, 2003, 5:20 PM   #2
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 7
Default IR?

I don't believe this is IR. I thought about this for a while, and I think I at least have a hint as to what you are seeing.

The sensor in the 10D uses a 3 primary color (RBG) filter Bayer pattern, from which the three color planes are synthesized by a matrixing (decoding) operation. I believe that the very low level "negative" image that you are seeing in the blue channel is a "remnant" of the matrixing process, and is merely an artifact of the operation.

The LP sodium lamp should have nearly no light in the blue range, and so what the camera sensor actually "sees" is quite unusual - no (or very, very little) signal in the blue pixels. The matrixing operation creates the ghost in the blue plane as a result of some very low-level overflow in the matrix operations. In this case, these low level artifacts just happen to be inverse to the strongest signals in the other two planes, thereby creating a negative effect.

I don't believe that it is IR at all.

V Pascal
vpascal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2003, 10:15 AM   #3
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 11

Thanks for the reply, I tend to agree now in the fact it is not IR, I couldn't see how that would be possible. Your theory on artifacts sounds good. I just couldn't understand how the van appears very dark, ie no blue signal, but doesn't show any noise like other areas of the scene with low light levels.
Dylan is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 AM.