Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon EOS dSLR

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 22, 2004, 9:16 PM   #1
Senior Member
marokero's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 769
Default Speeding up write speed in 10D

Direct quote from Rob Galbraith's website:

We've also retested the Lexar Pro Series 4GB 40X WA and Hitachi 4GB Microdrive in some cameras, to compare the throughput when each is formatted FAT32 with a 4K cluster size (the FAT32 default for the models we retested) or a 32K cluster size.*A larger cluster size should translate into a more efficient camera-to-card transfers, and it does. The performance bump in some cases is modest, and probably not worth the extra hassle of having to*format the card on a Windows computer to make it FAT32 with a 32K cluster size.

For the Canon EOS 10D, however, the write speed bost is considerable, especially given how slow a writer this camera is overall. For example, we measured a 38% increase in throughput when writing JPEGs to the Lexar 4GB 40X when the card was formatted FAT32 with a 32K cluster size instead of a 4K cluster size.
Hope this is helpful to some of you
marokero is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 22, 2004, 9:57 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803

Wow, I just might reformat it right now as I have the card in the computer. That is a great win, as I've been unhappy with the speed of my 32x Lexar 1g WA. It isn't bad, per say, but it's clearly slower than the 40x 512 that I have.

Part of the reason I don't shoot with RAW is that it's too slow to write. Now maybe I can use it without getting really annoyed. I never ran out of buffer using JPG, but on every trip I have tried RAW, I have run out of buffer space at least once.

eric s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 23, 2004, 2:02 AM   #3
Frank Doorhof's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,320

Problem is that 32KB did not work here, 8kb did.
Using a 1GB card.

Frank Doorhof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 23, 2004, 10:07 AM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 575

Good information!
Gandalf065 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 24, 2004, 9:47 PM   #5
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 35

Make sure you take the time to read the whole article.

He states anything smaller than a 2gb card will actually become smaller when formated that way.

Peter Gregg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 25, 2004, 4:00 AM   #6
Senior Member
NHL's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,331

This was originally picked up by folks over dpreview hacking with the Muvo2 4G microdrives: http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...essage=7666207

It's highly doubtful that it makes much difference in smaller CF cards since the camera interface with the flash cards is already not that fast: notice the speed differences between 12x and 60x cards in the 10D vs other cameras for example, especially the D70 (up to 4 time faster)... you're already @ its limit! :twisted:

With the 4G microdrive removed from the Muvo2 you are effectively doubling its speed... with 32k cluster, thus making this device more usable.
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:12 AM.