Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon EOS dSLR

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 28, 2004, 5:53 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7

Okay guys...

I could use some help. I would like to learn aboutSLRs. I know that you can't use the LCD as a viewfinder andalso that the pictures don't come out quite as sharp as with non-SLR cameras.

What exactly does SLR mean?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of SLRs?

Thanks guys!
TennBikeBerk is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 28, 2004, 6:18 PM   #2
Senior Member
Setiprime's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 484


I'm going out on a limb and assume you are serious.

SLR stands for Single Lens Reflex. This means it operates like SLR film cameras. Essentially, the image you see in the view finder comes in thru the lensthen through a system of mirrors and/or prisms.

I do not know who told you the SLR cameras produce lesser images, thats a bunch of ***. SLR produce the finest images that technology can offer us.

Another main advantage is that SLR cameras allow you to use a HUGE VARIETY of interchangeable lenses. Some of these lens run in to thousands of dollars (yes thousands).

They also capture the image in much less time than P&S cameras and produce images of higher resolution.

You have a much greater control over white balance, shutter times, aperture openings, etc.

The least expensive SLR (worthy of the name) still cost a few dollars under the $1000.00 mark.

Basically if you get into the SLR cameras, your STARTING to play with the big boys.

Theres so much more there is not time here - keep looking.
Setiprime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28, 2004, 6:25 PM   #3
Senior Member
ohenry's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,676

It's a misnomer that the pictures aren't as sharp from an SLR as they are in a consumer point and shoot. You can always adjust your settings to give you sharper and higher saturated pictures if you so choose.

SLR -- single lens reflex -- a mirror projects the image to the viewfinder from the lens. In a p&s camera, you have a separate viewfinder ( and/or lcd in the digital world)

Advantages are far too numerous to outline in this medium, but they include ability to change lenses to suit the image desired, generally they will have better focusing systems and exposure controls (although this isn't always the case). Disadvantages are their size and it's a never-ending money pit as you're always adding to your "system".
ohenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29, 2004, 8:51 AM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 325

two words: shutter lag

If your serios about capturing the moment the only an SLR will get it.
mrkryz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 29, 2004, 9:55 AM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 544

Post processing is usually required in DSLR photograpy because most folks who use these cameras prefer to control the parameters themselves instead of letting the camera do it on its own. The next level is RAW file format that gives even more control over the picture quality and parameters. DSLRs have larger sensors (and potentially better lenses) which usually results in more flexibility and quality than point and shoot cameras. It's possible to adjust DSLRs to do a lot of processing in the camera, but at the cost of flexibility.
Wildman is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:08 PM.