Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon EOS dSLR

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sep 27, 2005, 6:34 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1

If you were going on an extended vacation, and only allowed 2 lenses for your SLR... What would they be and why???

Gary Baal

Anacortes, Washington, USA
GaryBaal is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Sep 27, 2005, 8:09 PM   #2
Senior Member
wsandman1's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 318


I'moffering the followingchoices based onmy lens porfolio:

Since it's an extended vacation, I'd take my Canon 28 - 135 IS and my SIGMA 18 - 200 DC. If I could take three lenses, I'd take my SIGMA 17 -35, Canon 28 - 135 IS and my Canon 70 - 200 F4 L. In diggital coverage that's 28 - 320 mm.
If money was no object:

I'd take along aCanon 17 - 40 L and a Canon 70 - 200 F2.8 L.
I actually had to make a similar choices a while back and I chose my SIGMA 17 - 35, Canon 28 - 200, and the 50 mm 1.8 (it's so small that it almost the same things as having thecamera body lens cover)

wsandman1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 2005, 2:44 AM   #3
Super Moderator
peripatetic's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,598

Easy choice :-)

17-85 + 70-300 DO.

1. Semi-pro quality.
2. Small and light (certainly compared to anything else of similar quality).
3. Inconspicuous - no red rings or white bodies.
4. Both with IS.
5. Both with fast focus USM.
6. Coverage of 27-480mm focal length equivalent.

Perfect travel companions to the 20D.
peripatetic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 2005, 12:30 PM   #4
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13

I'm leaving on an extended (2 weeks anyway) vacation to France on Friday. I'm taking 3 lenses with my 20D:

Canon 10-22mm zoom
Canon 24-105 f/4L (yes I got lucky and got one of these)
Canon 70-300 DO IS

I considered taking my 28 f/1.8 but I'm already taking enough stuff and the IS on the 24-105 will help in low light. Plus I have a light tripod. As peripatetic mentioned, these lenses are all much less conspicuous than the white lenses, and the IS is a huge help.

If I could only take 2 I guess I would have to leave the 70-300 since I'm more likely to want wide angle than zoom. I think. Actually, I couldn't decide on just two which is why I'm taking all three!

marymac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 2005, 1:52 PM   #5
Super Moderator
Hards80's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046

peripatetic's suggestion is a great one for travel.. both lenses are small and light and are quite good optically.. sure there are better optics out there, but none that come close totheir focal-length to weight ratio..


Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 2005, 10:49 PM   #6
eosthree's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 48

17-40 f/4L
80-200 f/2.8L
Of course these are lenses I own, if I were purchasing today:
17-40 f/4L
70-200 f/4L
eosthree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29, 2005, 9:06 AM   #7
Senior Member
polarwasp's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 167

Almost same as peripatetic, EFS 17-85 and SIGMA 70-300 APO.... as that's what I have ... and it worked well for my trip to Hungary last august.
polarwasp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29, 2005, 10:22 AM   #8
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16

On a 300D

10-22mm [16-35mm]

70-200mm f2.8 [112-320mm]

Two x1.4 converterswould give me out to 627mm f5.6 which would probably be plenty on a holiday :shock:

Does that count as cheating ? :twisted:
MeanGreeny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 30, 2005, 1:55 PM   #9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 155

It depends. What kind of vacation? Where? If it were my kind of vacation...far away, mix of city, small towns, country, and national parks...then I would take two of those that I took to New Zealand: 17-85mm IS and100-400LIS. On that trip, I also took a Sigma 12-24mm (almost never used it) and Canon 1.4xII extender (almost never use it, either). 80-85% of my New Zealand keepers were with the 17-85--a most versatile lens. Most of the rest were the 100-400. A couple with the Sigma, and maybe one with the 100-400 and 1.4x.

You may notice that both my choices have IS. I consider IS to be so useful in a vacation lens as to be almost essential. Still took a tripod, though. Beanbag, too.

I could have taken a 28-135 (not wide enough), 500mm F4L (too big, too heavy for continuous travel), Sigma 50-500mm (too heavy, but if I didn't have the 100-400, it would have been my next choice), 50mm F1.8 (redundant), 35mm F2 (redundant), Sigma 70-300 (also redundant).

Have a great trip.

wburychka is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 PM.