Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon EOS dSLR

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Aug 14, 2006, 1:32 AM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23

I think I know why the 5D showsonly 95% of thepicture that it will capture.

After using the lens distortion filter of CS2you need asignificant margin around all of your shots to allow for pincusion or barrel distortion and vertical perspective correction.

I have 3 L zooms, 17-40, 24-105, and 70-200, all f4 and the 5D. Both the wide angle zooms show very significant amouts of distortion which once you are aware of you need to correct in PS for virtually every shot that includes straight lines.So if you had carefully composed your shot using 100% coverage as provided by say the 1D, there would be no room at the sides or top and bottom of the frame to correct lens distortions without loss of perhaps important details in the edges of your shots.
liningiv is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Aug 14, 2006, 1:22 PM   #2
Senior Member
BoYFrMSpC's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 339

If that was the case, wouldn't the people with Mks be seriously upset with their barrel distortions and lenses?

I think a viewfinder that requires a precise, 100% view coverage is significantly more than a near-100% view coverage. The whole purpose of the 5D was to attract people into a FF system that's cheaper than the Mks.
BoYFrMSpC is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:24 AM.