|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 558
|
I read a reveiw of the new Tamron SP 24-70mm DI VC USD lens.
I was intrigued because of Tamron has VC where as the Canon EF 24-70 does not have IS. If you had both of these lenses in your bag, which would you shoot with? Faithfully Yours; FP http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/ef_lens_lineup/ef_24_70mm_f_2_8l_ii_usm Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM http://www.amazon.com/Tamron-24-70mm-Canon-Mount-AFA007C-700/dp/B007SNP02K Tamron SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 12,266
|
Have you considered the Canon 24-70/4.0?
It's pretty good and it's stabilized.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 558
|
I actually have the Canon 24-70 2.8L lens.
I was interested in hearing if our experienced photographers would still prefer the quality of the Canon over the VC/IS ability of the Tamron. My hands are shaky, so IS means a lot to me as well the ability to shoot at 1/200 sec.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 10,366
|
IMO the 24-70 f/4 is quite silly when one can get a 24-105 f/4 with IS
![]() (especially when it's not even sharper that the Tamron @ f/4) http://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2013...solution-tests This is their conclusion:
__________________
photos (ϕοτοσ), light graphos (γραϕος), painting Last edited by NHL; Mar 12, 2013 at 12:46 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North West England
Posts: 1,434
|
from the reports in photoplus mag they really rate the tamron lens. that said i would have to try them out and see for myself
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 12,266
|
SLRGear.com tests image stabilizations systems. They haven't tested the Tamron 24-70/2.8, but of the stabilized Tamron lenses they have tested, Tamron's Vibration Control system seems to only gives you about a 1 to 1.5 stop advantage.
While something is certainly better than nothing, I wouldn't give it much weight.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,331
|
the tammy is a nice lens, but compare to the MKII it is optically a bit behind. But if you have shaky hands the VC would come in handy. I can handhold down at 1/15 or 1/20 sec. So IS or VS is not that big of a concern with fast lenses up to 85mm. Anything long I want IS or VC.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it. Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|