Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 23, 2004, 10:47 AM   #1
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 74

I see good reviews for the Tamron SP 17-35 2.8-4 Di. Unfortunately, at $ 485, its close to the cost of a usedCanon 17- 40 L and within $ 150 of a new one. Does anyone have experience withthe Tamron's older sibling AF 19-35 3.5-4.5?I see those new for under $ 200. If I shoot it at f 5.6 or 8, will I get good results on a Drebel with the 1.6 crop? Any "chip" problems withthe older lens that would affect the auto focus?
ADSchiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 23, 2004, 11:25 AM   #2
Senior Member
PeterP's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,396

I've got the Tamron 19-35 3.5-4.5 and it works OK, for the price I paid (under 200$cdn) It does not have the special glass and coatings of the high end lenses so don't point it around the sun, lot of ghosting. But stopped down I found it quite acceptable on a 35mm for getting wide shots close up.

I does work OK on my 20D, and worked fine on the 10D, as well as my eos1.

Sigma is the only one I have heard that used toneed occasional re-chipping to work with newer cameras. I have not heard of them having that problem with their current lenses, butI may be wrong.

Tamron SP 17-35 2.8-4 Di is supposed to be a much better lens, with better glass, and coatings, and a higher price to go along with it.

At 19mm you get a 30.4mm, 35mm equivalent on it. With the 17mm you get 27.2 equivalent.

PeterP is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 7:48 PM.