Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sep 24, 2005, 2:49 PM   #11
Senior Member
PeterP's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,396

Henrys recently had a sale on the 120-300, it was going for about 2700$cdn I think.

Best place I've found for prices on Sigma lenses is Downtown Camera.
http://www.downtowncamera.com/ especialy if they know you, or you are a member of GTCCC http://www.gtccc.ca/ or at least CCIC http://www.country-images-newmarket.com/

PeterP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 25, 2005, 3:44 PM   #12
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 69

I don't use, as a matter of routine, filters. I don't want to stick another piece of light reflecting glass between the subject and my lens. Do I ever use filters? I have two filters to fit my lenses. One is a politzer because there is no post processing that can compensate for it. My choice is to accept the risk of whatever harm a filter can do (using the politzer) to an image to remove the glare I know will be in the image otherwise. The second is a UV filter that I would use in, for example, a sand storm (you get the idea). I can't remember when I last used an UV filter, but, someday I may feel the need. ALWAYS use your lens hood. Protect the lens and reduce to possiability of glare. I can only reccomend the German made filters, Heliopan or B+W, if one needs to use a filter.
csnudelman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2005, 5:08 AM   #13
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 40

I always put a UV filter on my lenses for added protection and I use Hoya multi coated ones.

In my personal experience I can't see any difference in image quality with the filter on or off and I get extra peace of mind that my £££££ lens isn't ruined if I scratch the front etc. I tend to be a bit clumsy anyway!

Either way you look at it, I'm happy with using filters and the subsequent image quality so it's not an issue for me.

I would suggest borrowing a filter or trying one out and see if you can see any difference.
wrb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2005, 7:35 AM   #14
Senior Member
sjms's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,735

the use of a good quality filter is in most situations a plus especially in many environs that i shoot in. but in certain lighting conditions (point source in low light most often the removal can reduce the chance of ghosting). i have all my lenses covered using a filter but on occasion do remove them to shoot. i have lost 3 filters in the past 28 years from direct hits and dinged enough filter rings (that would have been the threaded edges of a lens) to make a lens collectors skin crawl. i use my gear in all conditions and all over the world. the use of a hood is an added good thing but they do tend to come off easier in crowds and such. i have chased a few around on the ground.

the last time i was over in the middle east and used both the wind just ended up putting a teaspoon or so of what they call sand right in the hood in about half hour hanging on my body. and it was a severe clear day

its all optional. i just choose to use them. i still get paid either way.
sjms is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 AM.