Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Digital Art (modified digicam images)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 12, 2003, 2:20 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,652
Default

Isn't it odd that I don't have this problem? I wonder what the difference is. Printer profiles? Are you using them? And in the Epson software, have you fiddled with the advanced settings in Custom? I find that, unless I'm using Epson paper, I need those custom settings. I have, for instance, a saved setting for Kodak satin and another for Kodak glossy.
bcoultry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 12, 2003, 2:56 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,585
Default

fenlander - job well done. I like the first better it does not seem to be as busy. I think simple scenes serve BW well.
gibsonpd3620 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 16, 2003, 12:34 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
hodad66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Indialantic, FL
Posts: 308
Default

Both are examples of what B&W work is all about! Rich, contrasty, sharp & wonderful.
hodad66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 18, 2003, 12:17 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Klaus DK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,216
Default

The second one is fantastic. It's a true classic shot - maybe seen before - but wonderfully timeless. Could be 100 years old.

You did a very nice job here!!!!
Klaus DK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2004, 3:05 PM   #15
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 54
Default

I am in Awe. They are both really good shots but the second one is simply amazing.
zace27 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:19 AM.