Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Software > Editors (Photoshop, Vegas, Final Cut Pro, Kdenlive, etc.)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jan 14, 2007, 8:51 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2
Default

couldn't really match these with any forum, but it seems to me photoshop people will have the answers.

1-is there any reason i shouldn't archive my photo cds with highMAT? do the images degrade in any way? is there information loss?

2-i know that if i open a jpeg frequently it begins to degrade but do stored jpegs on cd degrade? should they also be converted to tiffs before being burnt to cd? i use delkin archival gold disks.

3-when giving a client a low res cd of images from a portrait shoot, how low res should they be? obviously i don't want them to be able to print high quality pictures from the cd.
is 72ppi enough assuming they will be looking at them on a computer? how will that look on a tv if they use a dvd player?


thanks

jen





jenblack is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jan 15, 2007, 1:33 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, FL
Posts: 4,036
Default

You can open a JPG a thousand times and there will be no deterioration. You only lose quality if you save, which involves a re-compression of the image.

Unless you write a CD to RW media in packet writing format they are "read only". So they can't be saved back to the CD in such a way that you affect the original.

If the files are already JPGs there is no advantage to converting to a loseless file type like TIFF for archive.

PPI or DPI is totally immaterial to your problem. What is significant is the size of the image in pixels. I would probably make the images 400 pixels on the longest side if you want to be sure they couldn't get a good print. A better alternative is to watermark the images, which you can do with any decent image editor.

I'm not familiar with HighMAT. If you can extract a full sized JPG back from the HighMAT recording it is probably OK. But it seems I have read of people having problems getting the pure full sized JPG back from the HighMAT recording. If your originals are important I would archive them as data using mastering software to good CDRs. It is good idea to have two sources for archived photos in any case.


slipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2007, 2:15 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
BillDrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hay River Township, WI
Posts: 2,512
Default

I had never heard of highMAT, so looked it up on Google. Seems it is a method of making images/video/music/sounds/... readable on standard DVD/CD players. I cannot see the point of that for archival storage of images: being able to read them with a computer is the reason for archival storage. In addition, how likely is it that the highMAT will be readable in several years? One of the biggest dangers of archival storage is that the media will not be readable in several years - would you care to try to read an eight inch floppy disk? A document saved in some obscure format on an obscure WordProcessing program on an Atari ST? Sticking to standard formats (e.g., JPEG images & ASCII text) will improve the odds of being able to read them in several years.
BillDrew is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM.