Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Software > Editors (Photoshop, Vegas, Final Cut Pro, Kdenlive, etc.)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 9, 2002, 11:11 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 65
Default What Am I doing Wrong?

Everytime I post a photo or email a photo, I find that the end product is blurry and lacks detail. I normally make a duplicate of the original photo in Photoshop. Then, I resize the duplicate original tiff by making it into a jpeg. Next I go to IMAGE SIZE and reduce the file to 8 x 10 with 72 dps. I save the image and send the file. Am I doing this in the right sequence or is there a better way of doing this?
Steve Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 10, 2002, 12:11 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
KCan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,625
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Z
Next I go to IMAGE SIZE and reduce the file to 8 x 10 with 72 dps. I save the image and send the file.

I guess you mean dpi ?

8 x 10 at 72 dpi = 576 x 720 pixels

That's too low resolution for a "decent current" monitor which can display probably 1024 x 768 minimum ; if the monitor is set at that resolution, your receiver than have to magnify the pic to see it full screen ( of full width) implying degradation. Many monitor /pc use 1600 x 1200 resolution

Forget the dpi for the moment if you are not printing;
If the pic file is not use for printing process yet, just the pixel count and the compression rate are pertinent in a jpeg (and in a picture file).
a pic file 8 x 10 at 72 dpi is equivalent to a pic file of 4 x 5 at 144 dpi. ( same resolution of 576 x 720)

I think you better fix 2 parameters to resize your pic:
- the resolution depending on your receiver use of the pic
- the compression rate of the jpeg.

For posting and emailing I used to choose a relatively high resolution ( 1024 width typically ) and a high compression rate around 40% to make the file small (small file , but not too bad because you got resolution) .
A low compression rate ( to avoid too much compression ) and a low resolution is not a good combination , my opinion.

Well, what I mean is, it's worth to keep high resolution and force more compression to manage the file size.
Just make a test from the same starting pic, you will see.
KCan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2002, 12:52 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 20
Default

As Kcan said... Also I'd use unsharp mask right before saving the file. Even if you applied USM before - the results are mostly lost while downsizing the file. Set USM parameters to 180/0.3/6 and play from there.
Sergey
twopizza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 8, 2003, 10:21 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 173
Default comment

resize first before using filter/unsharp mask. View the resized image at 100% when using the unsharpmask so you can clearly see the effect.


I hope that helps with the good advice you received above.


Jim
Jim Ghiringhelli is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 AM.