Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > General Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 11, 2008, 8:05 AM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1

I wanted to know if there is such thing as a camera that can be both digital and film together?? A camera that uses film and features like film but have a view of pictures taken like a digital camera you know where you can view your pictures after it is taken and to develop the pictures you have to drop off your film. Is there such thing??
karlo_song is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 11, 2008, 8:40 AM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,402

Nope, nothing that can do it at the same time.

The only example I've heard of in smaller formats of a camera that's even compatible both waysis the digital back Leica made to be used with their R series of SLR's. I'm not even sure if it's still available today, and it's one of those "if you have to ask how much, you can't afford it" things.

Of course, if you have LOTS of money to burn, I believe there are digital backs for Hasselblad medium format cameras, but that's about it. If you wanna film camera, you're gonna need to buy a film camera. If you want a digital camera, ditto.

Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 11, 2008, 2:10 PM   #3
Senior Member
BillDrew's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hay River Township, WI
Posts: 2,512

Greg is basically right, but such beasts have been put together for portrait work as sales tools. The digital image was used for the client to preview while they were still in the studio and more likely to crack their checkbook/credit card/wallet wider open than they woudl be a few days later. The print would be made from the film. It can only be done for that kind of use because parallax would mean the two images can only be made to cover the same area at one distance.

I recall reading about that kind of rig something like 15-20 years ago when digital was no where near good enough to print an 8x10". Doubt there are any in use now since the resolution of digital is sufficient for any realistic enlargement. (Take a look at the Hasselblad backs Greg metioned if you have any doubts about that.)
BillDrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 11, 2008, 5:54 PM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 851

Yes, basically you would need to go medium format and then have both a film back and a digital back and swap them out. But why would you want to do that? MF Digital is head and shoulders ahead of 35mm digital and capable of creating some very large prints that would push the limits of MF film to match.
amazingthailand is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:57 AM.