Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > General Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 3, 2010, 10:24 AM   #1
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 45
Default 20x24 print out of pics

I want to take print of the below picture .. First one is original from canon 1000d and second one with blur effect and third one is more blur + little bit saturation ..
This is my first time that i am going for 20x24 size print out .. so need suggestion from you people that which one will look good in 20x24 size because i m not able to decide .so please give me your opinions ...
Orginal one

Name:  IMG_0137cp.jpg
Views: 409
Size:  88.6 KB

Blur effect
Name:  IMG blur.jpg
Views: 300
Size:  67.6 KB

Blur+ saturation
Name:  IMG saturation.jpg
Views: 273
Size:  69.5 KB
sandeepsaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Oct 4, 2010, 7:38 AM   #2
Senior Member
JustinThyme's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 361

Well, honestly none of them.
The look down and away doesnt do it any justice. almost a profile shot. I use a pose to get away from the direct look but leave the head at 45 degrees with a slight tilt up and eyes looking in at the same angle the head is pointing.

JustinThyme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 4, 2010, 8:37 AM   #3
Senior Member
VTphotog's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 4,165

This would be more appropriate for the photo critiques section, but, as far as advising on which one to use, I could only suggest that you print the one you like best.
As to the photo, I agree with Justin that you might want to re-take, but for slightly different reasons. The pose works OK, but the angle of the shot has the line of the cheek broken by the nose, which creates a discontinuity that bothers me.

VTphotog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 11, 2010, 8:51 AM   #4
Senior Member
RioRico's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: In mountainous California or Arizona or Guatemala or somewhere.
Posts: 224

I won't critique the pictures. I'll just say that you can print any image at almost any size. In printing, presentation predominates. The image itself is often less important than the paper, matting, framing, glassing, hanging, lighting, and surroundings. Almost anything can look good if it's far enough away.
Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, ZX-M, M42's, P&S's, more
The opposite of LIBERAL is not CONSERVATIVE, but ENSLAVED.
RioRico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 13, 2010, 5:53 AM   #5
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 54

I like the 3rd photo.

It's hard to know what it will look like when it's printed (I'm assuming your using a third party printer).

If you really want a nice print then go to a place that still hand prints them and work with the printer to get the desired result.

A new technique I've been hearing about is "print on metal". You can have your photo printed on metal which can then be framed.

It sounds weird, but it actually creates a very elegant print.

Here's an Australian website for it, however I think this process exists in every country:


-- Terry
TerryR is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:48 PM.