Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > General Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 24, 2011, 6:46 AM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 10
Default lack of viewfinders???

Looking for a new camera for my son, and finding a viewfinder seems impossible on $200ish priced point and shoot cameras. Have they figured out how to deal with glare?
Lesajoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 24, 2011, 9:10 AM   #2
Senior Member
PeterP's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,396

There are things like the hoodloop to help in viewing the LCD's.

Seem a bit expensive .

Imaging is all about light and your ability to sculpt it.
Equipment is just a secondary nuisance.
PeterP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 26, 2011, 9:55 AM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Marquette, MI
Posts: 285

Canon is apparently listening to the complaints of missing optical viewfinders, and has come out with an inexpensive point and shoot with an OVF, the A1200 model.


As for glare on LCDs, I use the Boxwave anti-glare protectors.



Last edited by denncald; May 26, 2011 at 10:00 AM.
denncald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2011, 3:59 PM   #4
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1
Default view finder a big plus

But, good luck in finding one with any kind of zoom and image stabilization (this is important) in a compact camera. My wife has used a Canon SD800 IS since 2007 and loves it, (it cost $380) but was recently damaged.

She is replacing it with a Canon 300 HS for only $165 but no view finder.

So I am now searching for another compact camera with a view finder, 10x+ tel. lens, IS, and 12mp.

Wish me luck!
justplainbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 22, 2011, 5:22 PM   #5
Senior Member
Steve40's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Asheville NC
Posts: 187

I don't know why no viewfinders became so popular, well yes I do. It's because they are a little by necessity bigger, and for awhile everyone wanted a camera they could stick! in their jeans watch pocket.

As far as being able to see the LCD any better than before, it aint gonna happen. Cameras with LCD only finders, are basically "Point and Pray" cameras when faced with bright sunlight. Well even sometimes not so bright.

I finally got tired of it, and not really wanting the complications of a DSLR, bought a Canon G12. Sort of like a DSLR in a little package, but with a fixed zoom lens, and an optically coupled viewfinder.
Steve Owen.
Cameras: Canon G12, and A1200. Sony DSC-H90. Fuji HS35EXR.
"A true photograph need not be explained, nor can it be contained in words".

Last edited by Steve40; Nov 22, 2011 at 5:26 PM.
Steve40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2011, 1:59 PM   #6
Super Moderator
peripatetic's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,598

It's at a different price point of course, but the Fuji X10 has a very impressive VF.
My gallery
My X100 blog
peripatetic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2011, 2:14 PM   #7
Senior Member
TCav's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,394

With a P&S, you're never viewing through the lens optically, and adding a second eye-level electronic viewfinder to the LCD monitor that a camera must have, adds considerable expense. So, for $200, yes, your choices will be few if any.
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:53 PM.