Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > General Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 7, 2011, 3:52 PM   #21
Senior Member
TCav's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,396

For people like us, professional and amateur alike, that care what our photos look like, and do what we can to get consistently better results, our 'Keeper Ratio' will certainly be higher than the average schlub with a cell phone. I don't think the problem is that media outlets are lowering their standards. I think the problem is that there are A LOT of schlubs with cell phones out there, posting their photos on social networks, and occasionally even a schlub will get what we would call a 'Keeper', if only by accident. And with a world full of schlubs, the chances that there will be some at some event that a newspaper wants a photo of, they're likely to find one. It's the infinite number of monkeys with an infinite number of typewriters, not a lowering of the editorial standards of the media. If they can't find a photo that's good enough to publish, they can just come up with another thousand words, which is also cheaper than paying a photographer.
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2011, 7:27 PM   #22
Senior Member
iowa_jim's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Central Iowa
Posts: 589

I'm thinking that photojournalism is going the same way that journalism is going. The concept of the investigative reporter seems to have been replaced by pundits who would rather protect economic stability rather than 'upset the apple cart'. For photojounalism, a picture that portrays what they want the story to be is better than trying to get a reporter and photographer on the inside for a genuine perspective.
iowa_jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 7, 2011, 9:02 PM   #23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Decatur, GA
Posts: 2,052

I am in the photo journalism business and luckily I have not had an issues that even comes close to suggesting that I am on my way out, being outsourced or getting my pay cut. I believe I produce great images and my editor agrees. Yes budgets are tight but I am lucky to have an editor that believes in what I do and tells me every so often. But then again if I worked at a different paper things might be different (you never know)
Photo 5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 16, 2011, 7:37 PM   #24
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 163

Equipment doesnt matter; timing does. There are awesome shots of the planes hitting WTC on 9/11 made by amateurs and passersby. DSLRs are bulky, so only pros carry them around. I wouldnt use a DSLR in Niagara Falls, but in the photo studio only.
romphotog is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:56 PM.