Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 23, 2016, 3:57 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 1
Default Mirrorless suggestions that dont disappoint

hi everyone,

looking into my first camera investment around 1000$. whats the best quality in picture I can get for 600-1300usd?

Use:
family, kids, vacation
portability is a plus, DSLRs are too big
basic functions, mostly auto and evening/sunset
good 1080p video with good stabilization is appreciated. 4K not necessary.

Concerns:
is a pro-point and shoot sufficient (jpeg) or will image quality disappoint

Considerations:
anything from an RX100 iii or iv, over G7Xii to varius point and shoot lumix, all the way to a6000 or a6300 (if the jpeg quality is really much better) to fuji or lumix.

I'd appreciate your feedback
Luke81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 23, 2016, 6:00 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,534
Default

For mirrorless cameras, I'd suggest a m4/3 camera. It's true that larger image sensors produce marginally better images, but as the image sensor gets larger, the more complex the lens design becomes, so the lenses for APS-C (and larger) mirrorless cameras tend to be not as good, more expensive, or both.
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2016, 2:56 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,534
Default

BTW, while mirrorless cameras are smaller and lighter than equivalent dSLRs, their lenses aren't any smaller or lighter than dSLR lenses. If you'll be getting multiple lenses, the advantage of mirrorless dissipates quickly.
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2016, 1:57 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia, New South Wales central coast
Posts: 2,885
Default

G'day Luke

I'd be having a sqwiz at the Panasonic Lumix G7 with the 14-140 lens and see if it suits your needs

Phil
__________________
Has Fuji & Lumix superzoom cameras and loves their amazing capabilities
Google me at Travelling School of Photography Australia
Recent images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/
Ozzie_Traveller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 19, 2016, 4:59 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
JacobVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 7
Default

There will always be more 'focus on the cameras capabilities instead of the most important piece of equipment.....You! Photography has always reminded me of similar beliefs on he golf course....blame the club instead of the swinger, something goes wrong and back to the clubhouse to purchase another club instead of more practice.........silly but always true.
JacobVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2016, 5:15 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
JacobVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 7
Default

There's a good reason mirrorless fans feel put upon. Read more of this independent report from Business Insider, not slanted to anyone's camera bias. The marketplace speaks and these are the facts
JacobVR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2016, 5:19 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
JacobVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 7
Default

I'm an adventure traveler and love my Olympus OM-D E-M1. Watching a fellow hiker struggle over 15,000' Salkantay Pass on our way to Machu Picchu while he was carrying his DSLR kit reinforced my decision. I think you were spot on about innovation. Mirroless does lag behind "full frame" DSLR in some areas, but that gap is rapidly closing. I predict that in 2-3 years max, those gaps will be largely closed. Will they be the same? Nope. Just as 35mm-based DSLRs are not comparable to medium format, nor medium format comparable to large format. Physics say they can't be.
JacobVR is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:59 AM.