|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Daytona, FL
Posts: 122
|
here's a night video I recorded at Disney World last night. Enjoy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxBVjYRplXE |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Daytona, FL
Posts: 122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC NY
Posts: 9,387
|
Liked the editing tranistiond of movie film, which editor was that imovie fcp
__________________
These are Pc low Budget Economy Hybrid camcorders Great for the Daytime Outdoor shots Light on the Object video made. No light No Video |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Daytona, FL
Posts: 122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC NY
Posts: 9,387
|
thank you . only if I can be updated on my Mac I can then use Im11 thanks
__________________
These are Pc low Budget Economy Hybrid camcorders Great for the Daytime Outdoor shots Light on the Object video made. No light No Video |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Daytona, FL
Posts: 122
|
Here you go, another recording at Disney from last night. Now this is some serious low light sample!. I think it did a good job.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jrSZ_qNqzM |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 9
|
Quote:
The second problem is a loss of resolution. What I am seeing in all videos from these cameras and most others is a drop in actual resolution in low light. What you get is barely equivalent to SD (note that the number of pixels doesn't change, only the detail those pixels are resolving). I don't think there is a way around this. The third problem is a fixed pattern noise. How much you see of this depends on the nature of the content (your clips didn't show much of it), but it's always there. These particular camcorders are hardly alone in showing this artifact. So far the only thing I know that will get rid of it is the Neat noise reduction filter, a plug-in for various editors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,084
|
Well to be fair, the Jazzcam was just a cheap $99 camcorder from Walmart
There wasn't anything comparable at the time for that price, but I don't think anyone ever denied it was bit starved though. As long as the scene wasn't complex (ie vegetation etc) it was passable, but it definitely wasn't recommended as your one and only camcorder for recording important stuff. 2 years is a long time in electronics, and today's inexpensive camcorders are definitely much improved.I do agree with you about the Samsungs. I have also noticed a tendency for them to get the short end of the stick with respect to video quality in reviews. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|