Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Konica Minolta

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 1, 2005, 11:44 AM   #1
redSP's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 57

I like to compare your settings and find out what is the 'average best' setting for the A200.

My personal default settings, the rest is standard or depending on situation:

Quality X.FIN, 8mp
Aperture priority

Contrast +1

Noise reduction onISO 100Single-shot AF
Continuous-advance mode
Digital zoom Off
Anti-shake On

redSP is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 5, 2005, 7:15 PM   #2
Geoff Chandler's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 85

This is a bit premature as I have only just got mine.
I really like the natural look of the photos - almost film like! On Portrait it is very clear - maybe a touch more colour would help things along - so maybe a tiny +1 Saturation their? As for normal use (I like apperture priority) Normal or Hard for the sharpness - depending on what the subject is. I am not really sold on the vivid setting - but I will hold it in reserve for punchy snaps. So I am trying normal with the +1 saturation which is less than the vivid. I expect +2 or +3 would be similar to vivd - except I think Vivid also does something more.
The flash is too much for nearer indoor shots - so I think -0.7 is about OK
I shall experiment quite a bit before finding my final preferences.
Geoff Chandler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2005, 4:59 AM   #3
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 50

I wouldreally like to set continuous advance together with remote control or timer so that I don't have to press the shutter release with my grubby finger and disturban otherwise shakefree image.

I don't think that this is possible. Any constructivesuggestions will be welcome.

bacs57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2005, 10:11 AM   #4
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 32

I use fine and P mode for routine shooting. Obviously, I use xfin or raw when I'm trying to be fancy. In shooting sports inside a gym, I set iso to 400 and S priority to 1/80 or 1/100 with continuous H. Most shots are underexposed, but by prefocusing on where I think the action is going, I seem to be able to capture the action pretty well (first time I've been able to do this - I can't match SLRs though) and intensity and noise reduction can be done in software. I don't know how this compares to the built in sport shooting inside. I keep forgetting to try it. Don't laugh too hard. For routine shooting, I often take hundreds of photos on a hike or at a tournament and can't really afford the disk space of xfin. My choice (and I use xfin mixed in there), but here are some experiements to give a sense of the price I am paying for fine vs xfin. I took three sets of very similar pictures at raw, xfin, fine, standard. Then I loaded the raw image and used jpeg groups jpeg compression to see what jpeg quality corresponded to the given file sizes of the taken jpegs. I found the standards corresponded to between 75-91 jpeg quality; fine between 89 and 96, xfin between 96 an 98.

Best, Cliff
reiterc is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:51 AM.