Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > Memory Cards, Microdrives, Card Readers

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sep 27, 2005, 3:23 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 18


I am planning to buy a new Compact Flash 512Mb for my A95. But should I consider the rapid one's ? Does a rapid CF (like 40x or 80x) has any benefitting effect on the performance of the camera?

I have read that the actual bottleneck is in the processor and the transfer system of the data to the CF and therefore, one should not expect any difference regarding the CF type.

What is the opinion of this forum?

Thanks, Yoel
YoelD is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Sep 27, 2005, 11:23 PM   #2
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Savannah, GA (USA)
Posts: 22,369

It probably would not make much (if any) difference using a fast CompactFlash Card in this model.

In most consumer models, you get diminishing returns by using a faster card.

In other words, you may see a very slight difference going from a 12x to a 40x or 80x card. Yet, you won't see a big difference like you'd expect if the camera's interface to media was very fast (as in some of the newer DSLR models which can write to media at dramatically faster speeds compared to a model like the A95).

But, there's not much price difference between slower and faster cards anymore. So, you may be able to get a fast card for around the same price as a slow one (Sandisk Ultra II, etc.). Then, you'd have a faster card if you bought another camera later, or wanted faster transfer times from a card reader.

Then again, by the time you get ready to upgrade to a new camera, you'll probably want a larger and faster card. So, I'd probably look for the best "bang for the buck (megabytes/dollar) for your A95, provided it's from a major manufacturer like Sandisk, Lexar, etc. You may also want to price the 1GB cards (they've come down in price some lately).

In smaller cards, Slipe (one of our forum members here) noticed that Office Max had a sale on Lexar 256mb cards last week ($10 with a $10 rebate). But, the sale is now over (so two of the 256mb cards would be another option if you can find one at a good price like that from a reputable vendor).

JimC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 2005, 12:26 AM   #3
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 18

Thanks Jim for your answer. I though the same, but wanted to have other people's confirmation.
YoelD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 29, 2005, 6:21 PM   #4
Senior Member
terry@softreq.com's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,538

For a camera like an A95 you could probably easily afford a 512 mb or 1 gig card.

They are pretty cheap these days.

I'd suggest going out and getting a cheapo on sale like a Kingston.

I have a Canon 20D ($1400 camera) and I use the cheapest 1 gig card I can find and I'm happy as a clam!

-- Terry
terry@softreq.com is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:42 PM.