|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 3
|
Which would be the better choice and does it make a difference on the image quality ?
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,331
|
What exactly are you asking. I presume you me Image Stabilization with IS
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it. Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 3,535
|
Image Stabilization vs High Speed? High shutter speed, if the ISO is low enough to give good, noise free results, but usually they work together, so it isn't really a question of one or the other.
brian |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 117
|
Are you referring to the HS or IS that is part of the model number of a camera?
Like SX40"HS" vs SX260"IS"? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bangor,North Wales
Posts: 2,684
|
If you mean Canon's identification, then IS means image stabilization and HS means high speed- referring to its newer models of digicam,which utilize CMOS sensors as opposed to the older CCD's.
Nearly all of Canons models with "IS" after the model number use CCD's- with the exception of Canon's SX1is bridge camera,which had an early type CMOS sensor. Of course, pretty much of all Canons "HS" cameras have image stabilization also. And in my humble opinion,Canon's "HS" models do have better overall IQ than their "IS" counterparts- especially at high iso settings and/or in low light. Last edited by SIMON40; Dec 5, 2012 at 1:48 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|