Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > Newbie Help

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Aug 15, 2005, 8:45 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1

Having just started out in this DSLR world with a Nikon D50, I'm told I should buy a circular polarizer filter. I see that Hoya is a good manufacturer, and they have several filters with a wide price difference. What makes the price vary seems to be whether or not the filter is coated, or multi-coated. I need help; is it worth it to buy a multicoated filter? Will the results be much different from a simple coated filter? Please help this noob make the right call! Thanks!
wtreid is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Aug 15, 2005, 10:12 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803

To me, it's a question of your standards.

Multi-coated filters should be better. But they might not be "better enough" for you to care to spend the extra money on them.

Here is a description of what multi-coatings help with:

Note this was written by a filter company, so there is a bit of a bias there. While factually correct it hypes them a bit.

As a side note, why do you feel you need a circular polarizer? They serve a purpose, heck I own one, but you shouldn't go buy one just because people say you should have one. They reduce glare off things... do you plan on photographing cars with lots of metal trim? Or what about water shots with the sun reflecting off it? Or sweeping landscapes and you want a darker blue sky? (there are better ways to get that last thing.)

Then a polarizer might be useful. But there is no blanket rule that says you must have one.

eric s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2005, 1:46 PM   #3
Senior Member
terry@softreq.com's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,538

A circular polarizer is kind of a cool thing, but I wouldn't necessarily use it on every shot.

They are very helpful for landscape photography.

You can "dial in" the amount of polarization you want. It can make a hazy shot look really good.

There are a number of other filters that are very cool for different effects. You might want to research a set of filters, if you decide you really get into it.

-- Terry

terry@softreq.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2005, 6:42 AM   #4
Senior Member
Setiprime's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 484

Buy what you need - not what others talk about. Camera bags (mine included) have items in them that get used once or twice - then you wonder why you bought it in the first place !

With digital - filters are not as important as they were with film - unless you are into getting a certain effect in camera. All filters (except UV or ND) have a performance price - i.e. shutter speed/aperture/etc.
Setiprime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2005, 10:46 AM   #5
Senior Member
hgernhardtjr's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 516

And, with digital, half the "filter fun" is editing in a program like PhotoShop CS2 ... I can replicate much of what Ihad/chose to do with my almost-retiredfilm camera lenses and filters ... and do not need to carry a bagfull of attachments.

Nonetheless, as I have for over 40 years,the one thing I still keep handy is a (circular for the "newfangled" digital cameras)polarizing filter!
hgernhardtjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 7, 2005, 1:09 PM   #6
Senior Member
PeterP's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,396

Just a couple of points, already mentioned in other posts.

Most filters cost you in light, a polarizer can ding you for about 3stops at its worst.
All filters incure a cost in image quality, every air/glass interface can potentially introduce reflections/ghosting and contrast loss, how much depends on the quality of the filter and the coatings used to supress the unwanted effects.

So only use them if you have a reason for doing so.

As the previous post said, many filter effects can now be done in software. The polarizers ability to cut out reflections is not one of them, as software cannote recreate what was not captured in the first place.

PeterP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 8, 2005, 7:05 AM   #7
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15

One other point about a filter. I always have a neutral one on every lens to act as a protector - if you clobber the camera against something sharp a new filter is considerably cheaper than a new lens, also cleaning lenses is always a dicey business as it takes just a tiny invisible bit of grit to scratch the surface.

There is a marginal loss of quality, as someone else points out, but I think it worth it.
dollyp is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:21 AM.