|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5
|
The absurdity of cramming 41-megapixels into a Nokia smartphone's tiny sensor defies description! How could anyone in their right mind think that this is a good idea?!
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: From the center of the USA (Kansas)
Posts: 1,359
|
Should be a pretty crisp photograph
__________________
The hardest part of accepting criticism is realizing I am not perfect.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 3,533
|
Check the links on the other thread about this. The sensor is considerable larger than usual in a cellphone, and the pixel combining yields some very nice looking 5MP photos.
Nothing I can take advantage of, though, being in a 'no service' area. brian |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 5
|
You need a 41MP sensor to produce a "very nice looking" 5MP photo? If Zeiss can really produce extraordinary 5MP images using a pixel-binning technique, more power to them. But on the face of it, 41MP sounds like pure marketing hype. I'm certainly willing to be proven wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 3,533
|
Part of the reason for such a large (physically, as well as MP-wise) is to make use of the f/2.4 lens, for fairly shallow DOF. Part also, is to allow you to zoom with a fixed lens. Granted, when you zoom to the max, you lose the pixel binning function, and the noise is back. The wide angle shots, though, certainly don't look like they were taken with a camera phone.
brian |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|