Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Nikon dSLR

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 6, 2006, 12:37 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2

This is my first time posting so if this has been asked in the past, please pardon my ignorance but I need the expertise of this community.

I am in the market for a dslr and have narrowed it down to the D80. However, I have a question regarding the lens kit. There are two appealing offers I have found but do not know which one is better or more practical. This will be my first Nikon, so I have no current Nikon lenses at my disposal.

With that out of the way, I am looking at:

1) D80 with a two lens set: Nikkor 28-80 mm F/3.3-5.6G AF zoom lens & 70-300MM F4-5.6 G Auto Focus zoom lens. This all for $1,199.99, or

2) D80 w/Nikkor 18-135MM F/3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S for $1, 299.

Is the single lens kit more practical although it increases the package price by $100.00 and will I get better quality pics. Or is the two/lens kit a better deal although maybe not as convenient. I will eventually decide the convenience factor so quality of the lens(es) and subsequential pic quality is where I am more concerned.

Thanks in advance for any help and info you can share!

bori is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 6, 2006, 1:08 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Victoria, B.C., Canada
Posts: 852

I know nothing about the other lenses, but when I look at Steve's sample pictures, taken with the D80 w/Nikkor 18-135MM F/3.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S lens, it seems (to me) that while the resolution in the center of the pictures is O.K., it gets more and more poor the nearer you get to the edges.

I may be comparing apples and oranges here, but I think my little Canon A300 has more uniform edge to edge resolution.

Herb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 6, 2006, 3:06 PM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 107

not sure why one lense is more than two? I've noticed the same thing, only thing I can think of is that it is more difficult/costly to make certain focal combinations.

I've always purchased lenses based on what I shoot.

For example if your into shooting things that are far away (animals, safari, sporting events, etc) you may be interested in a good zoom lense. If your into closeup shots of flowers and/or portraits a zoom lense probably isn't necesary.

If budget is an issue, you can always start w/ one lense then get more in the future.

eR1c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 6, 2006, 8:19 PM   #4
Senior Member
rey's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 949

It comes down to quality. The 28-80 is the cheapest lens Nikon makes today. The 70-300G is the cheapest telephoto Nikon makes. Both lens are non-'S', that's the 'S' in "AF-S", so they do not have in-lens motor for focusing, the body powers it using the screw wedge. Quality wise, I wouldn't buy the 28-80, it's also not wide as it starts at 28mm. I have no experience with the 18-135, but I've used the 70-300G, and it's a decent lens for its price, but it needs a lot of light and it gets soft beyond 200mm.

rey is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:41 AM.