Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Nikon Lenses

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Apr 3, 2010, 9:50 AM   #41
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 58

Thanks those are some awesome shots. I really need to get to a place where I can hold both cameras without them being attached with a cord to a board. I've held the D90 freely, but not the T1i, I did finally get to hold a T1i that worked and I didn't dislike the button lay out and such. So that is something worth considering.
las7828 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 7, 2010, 6:47 AM   #42
Senior Member
tizeye's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 382

A little late to the party....

I have a D40 with a 18-55 (pre-VR version) and a 55-200. Last week I upgraded to a D90 and elected body only. Debated on the 18-105, but realized 1) existing lens were serving me well, 2) only $20 more to later purchase the 18-105 separately vs kit now, and 3) savings could be applied elsewhere. Yes, the 50 1.4 is on my short list, but probably after a macro, and expanding my flash to multi off-camera which is what the savings is currently paying for.

Have to concur that the 18-55 is optically, a very decent lens and add that the combo is superior to the 18-200 that some consider as a single walkaround. Any shortcoming is probably the extensive use of plastic - which is becoming a norm on entry level lens and it has lasted 3+ years of extensive use. Here is an example of a picture posted on another thread taken with the 18-55 @ 18mm, but not wide open as was 1/400 f10 ISO 200. Watching the Landscape

That also is the issue that prompted this post. As I searched for photo examples that I had previously posted, most were taken with the 55-200. For example, this Florida sunrise and this Another day begins You may want to accerlate your plans for the long end. Easter weekend I went to St Augustine where that cannon shot was taken. Reviewing the 90 photos taken, about 40% were taken with the 55-200, another 45% were with the 18-55, and the remaining 15% with my ultrawide Sigma 10-20. I'm a Realtor and use the 10-20 extensively with my work, but may not be appropriate for most. I started that day thinking I would try using the 10-20 as a walkaround - my wife objected real quick, and you see the percentage useage.

Look at the photos you have taken with the P&S that are saved on your computer. What range were they actually taken? That may help you decide what lens you actually need.

Last edited by tizeye; Apr 7, 2010 at 6:55 AM.
tizeye is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 PM.