Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Nikon Lenses

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 1, 2005, 9:52 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 14

This lens cost about $330. A generic equivalent w/ aplastic lens is about $179.

Is it worth the price difference? It'll allow one to go all the way to 450 mm focal length.
TomSawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jun 12, 2005, 9:39 PM   #2
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 52

The ED glass is a great purchase to make, for a pile of reasons. First of all, that lens is one of Nikon's most popular, it has great performance, it is reasonably priced, and should you want to sell it later, you won't have much of a problem. Other lenses may be cheaper, but they won't hold a candle to it for overall image quality. The differences will seem negligible if you are only doing 4x6s, but for bigger prints and professional quality, you'll appreciate the quality.
ericsvendsen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 13, 2005, 11:00 AM   #3
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2

I think he's refering to the "G" series by Nikon which doesn't have the ED in it.
svtcontour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 19, 2005, 12:14 AM   #4
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10

That being the case take a look at the Sigma 70-300mm APO Super Macro II.
TivoManiac is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 PM.