Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus dSLR

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 15, 2009, 12:40 PM   #1
Senior Member
TekiusFanatikus's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Brunswick, Canada
Posts: 385
Default 14-54mm vs 12-60mm

vs. OLYMPUS 12-60MM E F2.8-4 SWD LENS

Obviously, the focal lengths are different. However, they are both 2.8 lenses which is what has me interested in these.

I would rather have the 12-60mm just to have more versatility (ie. wide angle and zoom), but price range, the 14-54mm might be more in my ballpark.
TekiusFanatikus is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Oct 15, 2009, 9:21 PM   #2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,228

I own the 14-54, and I have always thought it was a nice lens. The contrast and color are great, is sharp wide open, but a bit better at when stopped down slightly.

I doubt you will notice the 6mm at the long end, but you can bet you will see a huge difference with the 2mm on the wide end. It seem universal that those with the 12-60 like them, the only real penalty is the weight difference.

I have the 11-22 to compliment the 14-54. If I didn't have the 11-22, I'd have chosen the 12-60 in a heartbeat.

Bottom line is both are very good lenses. The 12-60 is newer, SWD, and more range. The 14-54 is a a bit brighter across its range (just a bit), lighter, still quite quick in AF, and less expensive.

fldspringer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 10:24 PM   #3
Senior Member
zig-123's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 5,070

I don't know if you're comparing the 14-54mm ED version 1 or the 14-54mm ED version 2 against the 12-60mm SWD. I had the version 1 lens and recently replaced it with the 12-60mm

My experience using the lenses with the E-30 is:

the 12-60mm is quicker to focus, quieter, delivers a sharper image and provides surprisingly good macro performance. As Greg has already mentioned, even though there is only a 2mm difference on the wide end, you definitely will notice and appreciate the difference.

Is the 12-60mm lens worth the difference in cost? That's a question only you can answer since as it all depends on the type of photgraphy you concentrate on and the amount of discretionary funds available and the 14-54mm lenns is no slouch. It performs quite nicely.

For me, It was as easy decision as I tend to do a lot of low light landscape/waterscape shots along with shooting flowers and people. In my mind, the extra money used to buy the 12-60mm lens was well invested.

Just my 02cents
zig-123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2009, 3:17 PM   #4
Senior Member
Dangerous Brian's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 140

I have the 12-60mm and find it a wonderful allrounder I do some wedding photography to help pay for this stuff and I also Enjoy it to. If you look at some of my pics most are taken with the 12-60mm even the close up ones of the rings and detail stuff.


I use E3, E330, 12-60mm swd, 50-200mm swd, fl50 & fl50R.

this combination from 12-400mm with just two lenses means I just have 2 cameras round my neck and have an instant range from 12-400mm
Dangerous Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 18, 2009, 3:25 PM   #5
Junior Member
BinaryGraphite's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 25

I thought I'd put in my two cents worth as I own both the 14-54 (first version) and the 12-60mm. Somewhere on the depths of my backup drive I have comparison shots I took with both lenses, done in manual (so same settings for exposure and as close as I could get them in regard to focal length), and without a doubt the 12-60mm was noticeably sharper. Not that the 14-54 was any slouch and perhaps the new version is better, but I second the notion that the 12-60 has a great close-up range, very fast focus (I use it on my E-3), very well built, and the zoom range it offers is indeed a little larger that can make that tiny bit of difference.

Although not downsides for me, it is a larger and heavier lens. Cost wasn't a huge issue for me, but as many have already said and you already know, it is more expensive.

If you want nothing but a cold opinion, I would personally recommend the 12-60, but bottom line, see if you can try each out at a camera store to get a good feel for them.
Check out my photography series on YouTube!
My Website | My Blog | My YouTube Channel | My Photography
BinaryGraphite is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:53 PM.