Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Olympus Micro Four Thirds

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 29, 2011, 11:32 PM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,402
Default At the Botanical Gardens- EP3 and a couple of lenses

I've taken my Olympus DSLR and 12-60mm f2.8-4 and 50-200mm f2.8-3.5 in to the tropical greenhouse before, but the lighting meant I really needed faster lenses.

Enter the 45mm f1.8. It could focus closer, but wide open you still can separate subjects from the background. More importantly, you can keep your shutter speeds up and keep the ISO down at 200.

Pretty obvious here where the focus was set..

I decided, after shooting the 17mm f2.8 M. Zuiko this afternoon, it's a pretty darn nice little lens. The chrome one also looks quite svelte on my chrome E-P3.

Last edited by Greg Chappell; Oct 29, 2011 at 11:55 PM.
Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Oct 30, 2011, 4:13 PM   #2
Senior Member
Tullio's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,370

Nice series, Greg. I had the 17mm once and sold it with the EP1. I did not mind getting ri of the EP1 (never cared for the lack of flash, poor LCD resolution and no ability to add the VF2) but I did miss the 17mm. I find it to be an underrated lens. Maybe the build is not as solid as the Lumix 20mm and 14mm but the optics are pretty decent. It would be nice if it was a f2.0 lens rather than 2.8. I bet it would have been much more popular.

Tullio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2011, 8:44 AM   #3
Senior Member
James Emory's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 2,357

Aside from the lower fstop, how does the 17mm pancake lens stack up against the Zuiko 14-42mm II lens in terms of image quality at the 17mm focal length?
James Emory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2011, 10:01 AM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,402

I've not done a direct comparison between the two so I'm not sure. At 18mm, the maximum aperture of the 14-42 is f3.9 so as you noted the 17mm has a close to one stop advantage in speed, so I would not doubt the 17mm is probably as good at f4 as the zoom is stopped down to f5.6.

The second advantage of the 17 is just its' size. The 14-42 has to be unlocked and extended into shooting position before it can be set to the same 17mm setting, which makes it, at that point, substantially longer than the 17/2.8. Against that you have to give the 14-42 an edge in that its' a zoom and you can freely move between 14 and 42mm. My three lens replacement now for the 14-42 is the 12mm f2, 17/2.8 and 45/1.8. Wider, faster and, at the two ends, much better optically. When I need longer, I'm using the 75-300 M. Zuiko.

Last edited by Greg Chappell; Nov 1, 2011 at 11:44 AM.
Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 1, 2011, 4:41 PM   #5
Senior Member
zig-123's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 5,070

Hi Greg,

Your photos always make me want to grab my camera, hop in the car and look for 'stuff' to photograph. These are no different. The 2nd image with the focus on just the tip of the bloom is my favorite composition. Just lovely.

You've quietly, yet systematically gone ahead and converted over to the m43 system. The results certainly say it all when it comes to what the camera and lenses are capable of when in the proper hands.



So you want to be a better photographer? Open your eyes and take a look at what is all around you.
zig-123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 2, 2011, 6:00 AM   #6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,487

Fantastic Greg!
LTZ470 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:02 AM.