|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which one | |||
| E-PL5 |
|
2 | 25.00% |
| OM-M5 |
|
6 | 75.00% |
| Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 1,446
|
If you already have a VF2 viewfinder, would you buy the E-PL5 or the M5?
__________________
Olympus E-3, Olympus 14-54mm lens, Olympus 35mm macro lens, Canon Pro 9000 Mk II Printer, Canon MP990 Printer, Slik U212 Tripod, Manfrotto monopod. Hasselblad H5D Medium Format DSLR with 80mm f2.8 lens. :-) |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 312
|
Quote:
Another part is how the E-PL5 "feels." I really like the PL2 at this point, but I keep reading about how the 5 is smaller. It's still a little ways down the road for me anyhow. I'm sure something newer and shinier will be around by then. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,350
|
They are cameras with different requirement. It is like going with a dslr vs a m4/3. The pen's have the compact size going for them. The OM is bigger, and can do somethings better.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it. Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Posts: 4,945
|
I have the VF2 finder and still would prefer the E-M5 over the E-PL5
The Viewfinder is built in and will not fall off as the one I own now. E-m 5 has 5 axis image stabilization better build I know that if I bought the E-pl5, I'd forever regret.
__________________
http://zig123.smugmug.com/ So you want to be a better photographer? Open your eyes and take a look at what is all around you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,350
|
also you can use an external flash with the built in evf of the om. Or go off camera flash using the built in flash as the controller and still have an evf.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it. Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 312
|
The real question might be if you want an Em5 Or EPL5+a lens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 5,139
|
Once you have used a camera with two control dials, going back to one and having to toggle controls is a real PITA. I have been considering having one of my Pens converted for infrared shooting and the one I would lean towards doing is the E-P3 just so I could keep two control dials.
I keep hearing there may yet be a successor model to the E-P3. Last edited by Greg Chappell; Jan 29, 2013 at 9:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: oakville, on
Posts: 282
|
Would say that if new to the format, the E-PL5 would be attractive from a price point. But as one already has the more expensive viewfinder, I'd hazard a guess that one also has some native lenses. So that brings the E-M5 into range, both in dollars and features. So I'd be tempted to say go for the E-M5.
As to a successor for the E-P3 -- that's a difficult decision. What does Olympus do to differentiate from the E-PL5 and the E-M5. Price it in the middle with the E-PL5 mechanics/sensor inside the P3 body -- would that be worth an extra $300? Priced at the current list for the P3, $899 (CDN prices) would be more attractive. Or, maybe release the E-Px as the rumored hybrid, mounting both 4/3 and M4/3 lenses. With a beefier hand grip as an option... |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,350
|
I would say, if you want a more advance body, the OM would be a good transitions from a Pen staying within the m4/3 system. If you want to maintain the reason people get a pen. For the more compact size with excellent photo quality that a pns can not match. The pen makes a better upgrade.
While I like the OM allot, for the price it still can not match mid level dslr in sport shooting ability with lenses or continuous AF accuracy. And the added size does not make for as nice a travel companion as a pen. For the same size a compact dslr like a rebel or nikon d5200 would give me similar ability as the OM with a much cheaper price tag. There will be a place for a ep3 replacement. Not everyone wants a m4/3 that is almost the size of a compact dslr. Also olympus knows they need to keep a pen with a built in flash in the lineup. That was one of the big drawbacks of the ep1 and ep2. They fixed that issue with the ep3. So the high end pen will retain a flash. And the epl and epm will loose the flash for cost savings and price point. 1 control dial vs 2 control dials is more a personal thing. I flip back and forth all the time between my dslrs and pen. It really does not matter as long as there is one dial so I can change aperture.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it. Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 4,380
|
Buy the OMD-EM5 and keep your EPL2 with the VF2 as your back up camera.
(See how easy it is to give advice on spending other folks money ??)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|