|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 71
|
http://www.7dayshop.com/photo-video-...m_term=4760593
not sure if they'd be compatible or worth it? any thoughts? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia, New South Wales central coast
Posts: 1,890
|
G'day KW
This is a very popular item for discussion - welcome to the "Closeup Lens club" Here's some posts where I have offered personal-experience advice on my use of closeup lenses Lumix G3 Close Up Filters Close Up Filters macro lens You can also go to the Steve's Forum Search box [top right of screen] and try a Search for "Closeup Lens" As with everything these days - always remember "you get what you pay for" and so cheap ebay / internet stuff will give you cheap results Pl come back with more Qs as they arise Regards, Phil
__________________
Has Fuji & Lumix superzoom cameras and loves their amazing capabilities Recent images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: near Los Angeles, CA USA
Posts: 4,608
|
I'm sorry but I don't know anything about this particular brand. I own the LC-55 and Raynox 250, and I can honestly say that the Lumix LC-55 is a better quality lens.
__________________
Panasonic FZ150, FZ35 and GF1; Nikonos V when underwater ~~Art is in the eye of the camera holder~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 71
|
thanks for the posts, i guessed the cheapness would be reflected but i was dithering about maybe getting one to practice w/. the Raynox are the ones i keep hearing about, maybe i should just save my pennies or keep an eye on ebay for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia, New South Wales central coast
Posts: 1,890
|
G'day again KW
Close up lenses + coloured filters are very much "you get what you pay for" items ps- a close up lens is not a filter ... filters are coloured or have some special task to perform, whereas a lens creates an image By all means buy one of these 'cheapies' if you wish - I did years ago when I was starting out. Measure the diameter of the lens [it seems to be 52mm] and I recommed you buy either a "+2" or a "+3" dioptre lens. The +2 will focus at 1/2metre, the +3 at 1/3metre, and you will still have 100% of your zoom available to change image size The big differences between lenses is a) 'normal' brands like Hoya, Mirumi, Lee, Tiffen etc will cost you 30-40 quid and the curvature & multicoating will give you a good sharp image; b) Raynox or Canon or Panasonic are 2-element lenses [2 bits of glass glued together] and give much better sharpness & colour, and they cost 100 quid, while c) internet cheapies are often factory-second quality [tho I am not saying here that all are factory seconds] ... you might get lucky Hope this helps a bit Regards, Phil
__________________
Has Fuji & Lumix superzoom cameras and loves their amazing capabilities Recent images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 71
|
cheers Phil, might get a cheapy just to see if the image/magnification difference is worth is worth it, then go for an expensive one later.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|