Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Software > Panorama / Stitching

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 12, 2005, 3:38 AM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7
Default

I went out today in the hopes of shooting the same scene/frames with different camera and mount settings to learn a bit about the process of taking nice panorama's.

Unfortunately a problem cropped up that I never anticipated. I found a really interesting view of our new Port cranes & railroad yard. I thought not only would the picture be interesting but it would have a lot of lines running at all angles.
I set up my tripod on the sidewalk of the railway overpass, got everything leveled out, did a quick check of what I think was "pretty close" to the nodal point then snapped a 180degseries of pictures. One thing I noticed right off was that the sun was at myright shoulder. I took them anyway just as a test of the camera's automatic settings. Then I swung back to the left a bit farther to try to capture 3 or 4 with the sun square at my back however here's when it got interesting.

A Port Police officer showed up, asked what I was doing & for my ID. While he's writing down my information a PD unit from the neighboring town shows up, then another port officer...another PD unit from town....State Patrol drives by checking things out then the Port Police van shows up with what I assume is their Response Team (4 very eager looking fellows). Only the first officer and I are talking, pleasantly I should add not interrogation style, then he asks me to not take any more pictures which I readily comply with. While I do understand my rights I did not feel like debating the finer points of the Constitution while wearing flexi-cuffs. I say that in jest as I was NOT cuffed, nor patted down or required to empty my pockets/camera bag. All in all they were very professional and I think understanding however it was clear that this wasn't something they took lightly.

When I asked about getting permission to take personal photos I was pointed to the PR office of the Port. I didn't really feel like going over there and finding out what they had to say about permission but probably will in the future.
I had planned on heading to the airport to take a few pictures of the jets but I have to say I'm certainly not entertaining that idea at this time!

The only series of shots I took were very bad (exposure wise) so I think I'll go find a less "secure" area to take test shots next time. I did try to get a panorama of all the officers but they smiled and gave me a firm, no thanks.
So that was my first panorama trip!
DanT.
DanTanna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2005, 5:04 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Alan T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chester, UK
Posts: 2,980
Default

DanTanna wrote:
Quote:
A Port Police officer showed up, asked what I was doing & for my ID.
This is getting really silly, all over the world. I found myself a few weeks ago photographing the new Scottish Parliament building (a bit of an architectural marvel, though I notice it has scaffolding here and there, so its M£400 cost didn't extend to making it last).

I wasworrying a little whether I'd be arrested, on security grounds, until I realised that this was one of the major tourist sights/sites of Scotland, photographed hundredsof times a day.

If they want people not to take photos they should say so, and/or keep people out. Did you hear about the organised tourist group of British planespotters who spent a long time in a Greek jail last year?
Alan T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2005, 7:25 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
BillDrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hay River Township, WI
Posts: 2,512
Default

Things are getting a bit nuts. Easy to understand why - the boredom that comes from sitting watching securty videos will make them grab at any excuse to get outdoors.
DanTanna wrote:
Quote:
... I took them anyway just as a test of the camera's automatic settings.
...
The only series of shots I took were very bad (exposure wise) ...
Did you shoot without locking the exposure/f-stop/white balance? If so, that will make for very difficult matching. Still be OK for nodal point testing though
BillDrew is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 AM.