Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax Lenses

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 22, 2007, 5:09 AM   #1
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 56

Using Pentax K100D, wanting to get something a bit faster and brighter for a walkabout lens, which I use for various occasions, would be a mix of indoors and outdoors use, I currently have a Sigma 70-300 APO which has been great for outside long zoom shots, and will probably pick up a Pentax-A 50mm F1.7 for low light/portrait work. 17-70 seems like a nice compromise, I currently have a sigma 18-125 3.5 - 5.6, and i can cope with losing a little of longer zoom, but I like the wide angle. Looking at the Sigma, 17-70 2.8 - 4.5 DG macro seems like a nice middle of the road for zoom vs. brightness in lens.
Any thoughts or experiences with this lens or something similar would fantastic.
Could i get away with 28-70 F2.8, is the loss of the 17-28 range of zoom an issue? Should I be looking to get something 2.8 all the way through zoom range?
would 18-50mm F2.8 be a better option?

shadow-wolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 22, 2007, 6:41 AM   #2
Senior Member
bluwing's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 592


Another lens to look at is the Pentax 28-70mm f4. I use this alot for indoors and outside shots. I had the sigma 28-70mm f 2.8-4, While it is a nice lens it is hard to find in the pentax mount.

As for the Sigma 17-70mm, I have heard both good and bad. Best bet is if you can got to a store and try one.

I have decided that from now on that any more lenses that I get will be f4 or faster.

bluwing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2007, 9:20 PM   #3
Senior Member
Hayward's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,318

Hayward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 26, 2007, 4:02 PM   #4
Senior Member
bobinoz's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 189

I have Sigma 17-70mm and it works well as a walk aroundon a K10D. Also have Sigma 18-125mm which wife uses on K100D. I'd say the 17-70 is better but not by too far and the extra range on the 18-125mm is useful.

If you look at my earlier posts they are mostly with the18-125mm and later posts are 17-70mm or 100-300 F4
bobinoz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2007, 6:42 PM   #5
Senior Member
mtclimber's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143

Ihappen to agree with Bob-

For those folks with a less than ample lens budget, the Sigma or Tamron 18-200mm lens do offer a very good and very viable alternative. That certainly does NOT mean that the Sigma 17-70mm is a less than a desirable lens. It is a great lens and very sharp. However, its focal length is somewhat limited for somebody who might be looking to maximize their lens budget.

mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 21, 2007, 4:10 PM   #6
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1

Hi, I have both the Sigma 18-200 DC and purchased a week ago, the Sigma 17-70 2.8 DC. Camera is a K10D

I think the 17-70 is a real find, I was desperate for a good macro on a walk around lens, and this is a winner.

I think the quality of contrast, sharpness and speed is as good for as many much higher price lenses. The 18-200 is a flexible lens, but not as sharp.

Here are some shots taken with the 17-70 right after I got it, a little large but clearer that way.

Two quick shots, old house and fronds of a palm tree. House was at 1000/sec - F8 - 17mm - inset is at 100%.

Fronds at 1/60th - F16 - 37mm

Absolutely no PP, shot in JPG with +1 Sharpness.

And a macro of a garden orb spider. Shot from around 3" (7cm), Macro seems crisp and bright. Shot was F16 - 70mm - 180/sec - ISO 200 - Spot Metering on K10D.

I doubt this male spider, the smaller one live much longer. It is the custom of spiders to eat the male after mating...

matix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 21, 2007, 4:19 PM   #7
Senior Member
robar's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590

matix wrote:
I think the 17-70 is a real find, I was desperate for a good macro on a walk around lens, and this is a winner.
i'd be interested in seeing some shots with the lens wideopen.

edit: forgot to say those are excellent captures.
robar is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:30 AM.