Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax / Samsung dSLR, K Mount Mirrorless

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 17, 2007, 6:14 PM   #1
Senior Member
ennacac's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,198

Tell me what you think about the original image processed

Image processed with Benjamins method

ennacac is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 17, 2007, 6:32 PM   #2
Senior Member
WackyRoger's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chama, New Mexico
Posts: 6,206

Tom now that to me is a tuff choice. After looking at them numerous times I would have to choose #2 but then again I would be real proud of #1 if I had taken it.

WackyRoger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2007, 7:46 PM   #3
Senior Member
TDN's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,288

Well for this particular shot I'd say nr 1, because here we're interested in the bird, not in the background.

Benjamins method divides the attention more accross the entire frame rather than keep it on the bird.

I do think if you took a shot where the subject was bigger, I'd prefer his method.

Depends on the situation really..
TDN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2007, 8:22 PM   #4
Posts: n/a

i don't really know.... but if it was mine, i'd do a layer mask over the bird and blur all the rest slightly because there's too much detail and confusion in the image. just enough for it to look like DOF effect.

  Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2007, 8:54 PM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 127

TomI think Bens technique gives the photo allot more pop and looks better

87olds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2007, 10:24 PM   #6
Senior Member
nznhut's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 303

Number 1, definitely. The subject matter doesn't lend itself to Ben's technique, which is great for certain subjects and styles, but not Mr. Rooster in his setting.

Number 1 is natural, not harsh or cartoonish, a definitely nice pic
nznhut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 17, 2007, 11:28 PM   #7
Senior Member
mtngal's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,004

Very interesting - I agree that some subjects react better than others for this process. I think I'd take the background from the first one, blur it a bit like Roy suggested, then take the bird from the second one and put them together. In many ways, the differences for this one are small.
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 3:15 AM   #8
Senior Member
bilybianca's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hassleholm, Sweden
Posts: 3,425

And my opinion is the contrary. I think the background looks better after processing (even though I think it might be worth a try to blur i a tad). But IMO the bird itself looks overprocessed in #2. Maybe 50/50 of the two?

bilybianca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 7:28 AM   #9
Senior Member
bluwing's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 592


I am in the minority here. I like bens method better. The first picture looks like it was taken on an overcast day. The second picture looks like it was taken on bright sunny day.

Also in the second one the bird does stand out better. I think Bens process is more for portrait use than widlife or landscapes.

this is how I would have done it. I hope that you don't mind Tom. I used your first picture.

Attached Images
bluwing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2007, 7:37 AM   #10
Senior Member
thkn777's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,831

For me #2 is too "strong". I am with the others suggesting a somewhat blurred background. Since I found that I use something similar to Ben on my own pics (was actually surprised to find that someone else does such crazy things :? ) I gave it a try.

This is also done with layers. Original layer is #1. Second layer is based on #1, applied a gauss deconvolution (sharpening) with a very small radius. This was only to emphasize the already good sharpness. Then I used a adaptive blur filter (about 50/50/12) several times to separate the bird and sharp foreground from the background. Applied max and min filter (ony a tad), increasedshadows to show the birds feathers a tad more in the darker regions. Layer was set to "hard light" (!!) and I played with opacity till I thought it was ok. Since the picture was too dark now I made a 3rd layer and set it to "negative multiply" and again played with controls. The result looked a tad too sharp and had too much contrast in the snowy foreground thus I enlarged by 2, de-pixelized and resized to original size making things look a tad smoother without loosing too much detail. Duplicated the final result and used "soft light" with about 25% opacity. The bird is now a lot more isolated from the background and it makes (for me) much more dramatic because of the added "depth" from the blurred background.

This is great picture and I very much enjoyed looking at it, be it the original or my modification. I like the colors and the more sunny overall impression inthe modifiedpicture - everybody has it's personal preferences I guess. Hope you don't mind stealing your pic for that - since I started with my dSLR and have an increased amount of post-processing I am very interested in different techniques.

Here you go - I hope you like it:

thkn777 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:05 PM.