Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax / Samsung dSLR, K Mount Mirrorless

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 27, 2007, 6:43 PM   #1
abieleck's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 55

Im looking for a wide angle lense, I have my eye on the Sigma 10-20mm (around $500), but wonder how a .45x ($50 on Ebay) wide angle screw on lense would perform on my 18-55 kit lense. I have never used a screw on lense, I would obviously prefer the Sigma 10-20mm, but I am on a budget soif the results were comparable I may just settle for the screw on lense for now. Alsotaking into consideration would be a whole new set of 77mm filters to go along with the Sigma.

I guess i am just looking for any input concerning the Sigma 10-20mm and the .45x screw on lense in general, and how the results would compare. Also if the .45x could be attached to a filter on the 18-55mm lense without showing up in the picture. Any example pictures would be much appreciated.Thanks!

abieleck is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 27, 2007, 10:14 PM   #2
Senior Member
Hayward's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,318

I will NOT even begin to say as good, BUT vs the cheap MAGNIFYING like 2x fronts... infinately better.

Partly because the are condensing rather than magnifying.

I got a cheap set of both.... the tele WORTHLESS on a long lens, and poor even on a 70mm.... the WA though on my Sigma 28-70 (old 52 mm 3.5-4.5 ver) is rerally quite good.

Probably more curvature distortion than a true MM lens would be, but if you don't mind that very little other IQ issues. And at 0.4x brings that 28mm down to near 14mm for the need.

I would hold it there though... unless you are OK with extreme distortion I'd avoid the 0.25x ones.

And again NO COMPARISON to a true low MM lens but HUNDREDS if not thousands cheaper, if only occasional need.
Hayward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2007, 5:03 AM   #3
Senior Member
errno_gmm's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 518

there is no comparison
errno_gmm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2007, 11:24 PM   #4
Senior Member
Hayward's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,318

And of course I NEVER said THERE WAS.....

But for OCCASIONAL use vs HUNDREDS, even thousands of dollars for a true low MM lens.... not that bad an at all compromise. (IF you can natively match it)

Once in a while I need to take my 28mm to 14mm....low budget cheap WA.... it actually does quite amazingly well for a $15 cost vs $$$$hundreds.

Again the cheapo front 2X mags forget 95% of them, but actually the at least 0.4-7x range rear TC's actually do quite well often. (For their low cost as well) But the chapo 2X Mag extenders forget most... but actually the WA's do surprisingly well.

And I will reiterate the caveate too.... that the WA NATIVELY fits on your lens.... most chaepo WA's are 52 mm under that not a big problem... but over a 52mm filter fitting then YES, vignetting and all that is likely to come in.

And why picking up an older SIgma 28-70mm (half stop slower than current 2.8-4 ) but 52mm fitting lens I have been happy with.... The Sigma 18-50mm standard DC is bad enough for even frame coverage wide open.... big vignetting on the WA with adapter (58-52mm) BIG time (an the current 28-70mm Sig is also 58mm).... but unoticeable on the 52 native MM older Sigma 28-70mm lens.. And getting to the Pentax 18-55mm KIT also a native 52mm filter fitting.

Again how often do you REALLY need to shoot ultra wide, vs hundreds or thousands of dollars of cost?????(For a near flawless lens) AND toting around that costly lens for tyhe FEW times you should you need it?
Hayward is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:44 AM.