Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax / Samsung dSLR, K Mount Mirrorless

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 10, 2007, 9:43 PM   #1
Senior Member
snostorm's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago Suburb, IL, USA
Posts: 2,769

Hi All,

I just received a Bargain grade Tamron SP 80-200/2.8 LD Adaptall II from KEH. As usual, it's just shy of mint/EX, and probably graded down because it's missing both lens caps and the dedicated hood. I found a used 82mm screw in hood, and a used 77-82 step up ring, so I went out and tried the lens with my 1.4x AII TC, and the Pentax F1.7x AFA on the DS and just the F1.7x AFA on the K10. These were shot with the second combo.

Bluejays were almost wiped out by a virus that also effected Grackles and Housefinches in my area last year -- I only spotted one all last year. All these species have made a big comeback this year, and I've already seen 4 Bluejays, but these were the first shots I've been able to manage.

I was waiting by a recently discovered preferred bathing area for a lot of the birds nearby, a little stream at the bottom of a little ravine. I've seen as many as 6 different species visit this exact spot in less than an hour.

They're a bit soft -- not the len's fault -- the exif is intact on the first, but for some reason missing from the other 3. The sun went away right before this series, and I failed to change from ISO 200, so the shutter speeds are REALLY slow -- 1/40 - 1/60 of a second, and I had just taken the 1.4x off, and forgot to change the FL setting for the SR from 500. Heat of the moment stuff. . .

Enough typing -- here are the pics.

#1 checking it out. . . the water seems fine. . .

#2 might as well jump right in!!. . . kersplash!!

#3 Uhhh. . .anybody got a Towel????

Wish I had a flash. . . or the DS with me, set up properly -- but they're pretty good anyway . . . for 340mm @ 1/50 sec with the SR set up wrong.

The verdict on the Tamron 80-200/2.8 LD AII ?-- definitely a keeper. Sharper than my Tokina SP80-200/2.8 AT-X Pro AFII, the Tokina MF 80-200/2.8 MF I tried but never owned, and the much touted Tokina 100-300/4 MF that I bought recently. It stands up to use with the F 1.7x AFA, but my first impressions are that it's too soft with the stacked TCs -- I'll try this again tomorrow with the DS and maybe a flash. PF is there, but not bad really, considering the vintage of the lens. Unfortunately it doesn't hold focus throughout the FL range with the TC/s, but none of them do. It does, however do this when used alone. It's a one-touch zoom which I kinda like despite the opinions of many others who hate them. This would be a great zoo lens IMO.

A very good buy, IMHO for just over $200. It weighs just about 3 lbs and is a baby compared to the SP300/2.8, which is what I've been used to (if anyone really can get used to a 5lb+ lens). A nice plus is the removable tripod ring which also fits the FA*300/4.5 almost like it was made for it.

You'' be seeing more from this lens. . .


Edit:---Errrr 3 images - I was planning on posting 4, but the other was another "splash" shot, and I omitted it, forgetting to edit the Title line. . .
snostorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 10, 2007, 9:53 PM   #2
Senior Member
JimInGA's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 307

That last one is awesome. I've seen a number of bluejays around, but haven't managed to get a goo shot at one. Nice watering hole you found.

JimInGA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 10:05 PM   #3
macshak's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 91

Great shots Scott.
I have a couple Blue Jays around here. They don't pose that good though. A Bluebird showed up a few days ago (never seen one here before), but have been unable to get a shot.
macshak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 10:37 PM   #4
Senior Member
ennacac's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,198

SOFT? Those are great shots.

ennacac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:28 PM   #5
Senior Member
bilybianca's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hassleholm, Sweden
Posts: 3,425

Yeah, really great. I can't see any softness. I like it a lot when a short series of pictures tell a story like this, beautiful and funny at the same time.

bilybianca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2007, 11:58 PM   #6
Senior Member
mtngal's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,004

Very nice for "soft" pictures - I can imagine what you'll be able to manage without the operator errors (at least you didn't forget to have the camera set for a mode that controls exposure, like I did once).

Your bluejays are much prettier than the ones around here (stellers and scrub jays).
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2007, 12:45 AM   #7
Senior Member
rhermans's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Antwerp - Belgium
Posts: 3,454

Scott - nr1 and 3 are wonderfull. Nice to see that nature always tries to make a comeback and Yep that lens is a keeper.
And I can't see anything soft. Ronny

rhermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2007, 1:32 AM   #8
Senior Member
Peacekeeper's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,024

I actually prefer number 2, I can see the frenetic activity that is going on and even though I can't see the bird I can visualise what must be under there.

Noice shots, all three.

Peacekeeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2007, 5:31 AM   #9
Senior Member
robar's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: D/FW area Texas
Posts: 7,590

definately a keeper scott. #2 does it for me.
robar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11, 2007, 7:09 AM   #10
Senior Member
NonEntity1's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lake Placid Florida USA
Posts: 2,689

Well I would sure be happy with your "soft" shots. I like the third one the best. "Dude, where's the party?" is the caption that comes to mind, for some reason it puts the image of headbanger with a mohawk in my mind.

NonEntity1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:53 PM.