Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Pentax / Samsung dSLR, K Mount Mirrorless

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sep 13, 2010, 3:28 PM   #1
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 224
Default A Question?

Many of us here on Steves fully remember shooting film and getting what we got when we got that fim developed. The idea of a digital slr or digital film for a film slr was only a dream. I for one was never able to afford my own dark room. Nor did I have a place to put one. I did howerver try the Daylab 300. Was thrilled to print my own pics. But even that was very limited and I never really did get the hang of it. Such things as push or pull processing were known to me but I could not afford to be wasting film experimenting with them. B&W I liked and did with some success. I never got into using colored filters except a polarizer. The only "tricky" thing I did with film that I was relatively successful at was stereo with a stereo adapter.
Now however I own a camera that is a darkroom unto itself! Color filters at the push of a button. "Film speeds" unheard of when I had a film camera. I can tweak and twist and perfect my shots with more tools at my fingertips than many pro film shooters ever dreamed of. Yet..........When I shoot I still shoot mainly for the "normal" shot. Lighting , content , subject , composition , focus..........all the things that most of us concern ourselves with each time we have a camera in our hands.
I know that all of us here experiment with our photos. Different filters and effects. But almost all the shots we post here are of the "normal" variety.
My question is ,and this is a sincere question, how many people here routinely use and consider indespensible the various frilly things that our modern digital cameras offer us? Such as in camera HDR, toy camera filter, retro filter, double exposure, color filters, etc.........Dont get me wrong I love playing with those things and love the fact that when my boy plays with my camera he says "this camera is way cool".
I know that what all these things included with the camera do is not provide each photographer with his list of favorite tools but rather broaden the camera's appeal to the largest possible group of photographers.
I was just wondering.........................................
bock1965 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Sep 13, 2010, 4:26 PM   #2
Senior Member
John.Pattullo's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 613

i doubt the enthuiast photographer uses them much but more for the consumer market where they play with effects etc
Pentax-DA 12-24mm f4 | Pentax-DA* 16-50mm f2.8 | Pentax-A 50mm f1.4 | Tamron 90mm f2.8 Macro | Pentax-DA* 60-250mm f4 | Sigma 150-500mm
Pentax Photo Gallery
John.Pattullo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 13, 2010, 7:30 PM   #3
Senior Member
Black Knight's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oxford, CT
Posts: 1,309

Hi Bock1965
I use the Basic camera functions only.
Black Knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 13, 2010, 8:37 PM   #4
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Clifton Forge, Va
Posts: 31

I like the star filter for night shots - especially Christmas decorations. I have not experimented with HDR but I expect to use it on occasion after I get the hang of it. The color extraction is also a fun filter. I agree with Brock 1965, some are useful features and some are just gimmicks. But, my Pentax K-x would still be a wonderful tool without them.
Ex-Clerk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 13, 2010, 8:39 PM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East Central Vermont
Posts: 1,890

I find it quite challenging to take a good "regular" photo. I doubt if I'll try many frilly extra features until I get really good at normal photography -- and I suspect that will be a very long time from now!
mtnman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 13, 2010, 8:53 PM   #6
Senior Member
mtngal's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,004

I'll use the in-camera HDR when I have a tripod, but I almost always also take a 5 auto exposure series as well. There have been times when the best choice was the one the camera came up with. I've occasionally use the selective saturation, kind-of fun. I've also used raw + and had the camera set to b&w - useful when I want to get an idea of what I'd get when converting in post processing. I wish the K100 could shoot raw+ because I've been using it to shoot through an IR filter.

Multiple exposures can be fun and creative, but take thought and prior planning to use effectively. I don't use it very often because I find it hard to visualize such things. But it's been interesting when I have.

Most of the other processing the K-7 does in-camera are things I generally ignore, they can be done better with software afterwards. But it can be fun to play around with them when I'm feeling bored or frustrated with my day-to-day world.
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 13, 2010, 10:14 PM   #7
Senior Member
Hawgwild's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 3,466

Bock, my opinion of this whole mess is...whether you shoot film or digital, the destination is the same, but the vehicle is totally different. I always shoot for fairly normal results, although I love being able to adjust shadows, highlights, color saturation, etc. Is that cheating? I call it control, way more than we had with film...
Always use tasteful words - you may have to eat them.
You cannot find knowledge by rearranging your ignorance.

My Flickr

Hawgwild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2010, 6:13 AM   #8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 224

Robert, yes I agree that it is control , and alot more than we had with film indeed.
bock1965 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2010, 12:05 PM   #9
Senior Member
fofa's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 547

Geesh, I'm still trying to learn aV and tV with the thumb wheel.
fofa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2010, 12:27 PM   #10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Washington State
Posts: 930

One of the things I love about my E-1, and one reason I haven't switched to Pentax yet, is that it has no 'extras' like scene mode or filters. It's just a camera that has replaced film with a sensor. I'd rather pay for a camera with awesome basics than one with lots of frills. Things like scene modes can be replicated if you know what to adjust and you'll learn a lot more about shooting if you have to. As for the rest like filters etc post processing can take care of all that and then some. The only thing I couldn't live w/o anymore is RAW. So to answer your question, no i don't use the frills

jelow1966 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:31 PM.