Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Photo Critiques

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jan 24, 2010, 6:21 AM   #21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 589

Originally Posted by musket View Post
I think that in the first shot that the selective focus is what seems out

so I tried an edit with selective focus and brightening
Ok, that's pretty good. I'm just looking at it on my phone right now, but I am impressed. Can you explain your steps in achiving this?
tony3dd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 24, 2010, 10:32 AM   #22
Senior Member
mtngal's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,004

I downloaded the first one and played with it some myself. The more I look at it, the more I think the focus is what's wrong, that there's nothing wrong with the lens. If you look closely to the left of the eye, you can see a bit of blurring in the fur, and while the hind quarter on the left side is a bit blurry, the tail, just above it, is mostly sharp. I did a quick edit, sharpened using a high pass filter (not what I normally use for sharpening, but often a useful technique), and then used levels to change the white point only. I thought musket's edit went brighter than what I personally prefer - it all depends on your taste.

Here's what I came up with, with very little time involved (thought about your picture for longer than what I spent in photoshop).
Attached Images
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 24, 2010, 11:16 AM   #23
Senior Member
musket's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,768

Using Coral Paint shop pro X that I got here.


I used quite a few steps..the first was smart photo fix which brightened

and sharpened 'auto'

then color>>channel mixer main channel 167 others -37

then hue/saturation/lightness saturation -32

I thought there where noticeable artifacts so then used jpg artifact removal set at maximum. (I might have used digital camera noise removal as well)

to sharpen I used unsharp mask at radius 1.00 strength 100 clipping 0

I then used the selection tool to make a box around the rear leg and used unsharp mask set at radius 2.00 strength 100 clipping 0 to perform selective focus

then optomised and saved as a jpg
Attached Images
musket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 24, 2010, 12:21 PM   #24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 589

Thanks to all for your help. I am pretty sure now the lens is fine. I sent some of my images to Pentax for Joe Virgil's opinion, and he believes the lens is fine.
tony3dd is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:54 PM.