Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Printers > Photo Inkjet

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 18, 2002, 11:25 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 133
Default Steve reviews; something missing

I read your reviews of printers and things said on this board and one issue has come to mine form the post "B&W print Epson 2200 vs Canon S9000" in which you state the Epson 2200 does great B&W and the canon S900 stinks" but in both your reviews i failed to see one B&W picture. To me B&W printing should be a staple like text printing in all printer from bottom to top of line. There is no reason a $100 printer should do text better than a printer costing more they should all be the same. Why do you not include B&W pictures in your reviews? It seams to me this is a important issue that many people have when picking a printer unlike myself that has never printed a B&W picture unless it was that was from the start.
PhotoMenace is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:33 PM.