|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hasselt , Belgium
Posts: 746
|
Looking for best sharpness results which of these would best perform on something like a Nex-5n or C3 ....
The 18-200mm (Nex) or the 16-80mm f/3.5-4.5 (Carl Zeiss) with adapter ?
__________________
Sony RX100 |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,502
|
I'm using 29 lenses (from 8mm to 500mm) for NEX5 - one sharper than the other :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 12,261
|
The Sony/Zeiss SAL-1680Z is sharper than the Sony SEL18200, but it's not stabilized on a NEX body, and it won't AF on the $200 LA-EA1 adapter, only the $400 LA-EA2 adapter.
If you're going to buy a NEX body with the LA-EA2, why not just buy an SLT-A35?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hasselt , Belgium
Posts: 746
|
My point being was to have a small high quality package , why don't sony do like samsung (30mmf/2 pancake - 85mm f/1.4) and deliver decent lenses for their nex system ?
__________________
Sony RX100 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 12,261
|
They're coming.
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|