Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Sony

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Apr 22, 2005, 9:08 AM   #1
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 41

Recently tested the W5 against the Casio E55 and both were very close. I liked the charger and battery life of the Casio and the photos. However, the W5 was better.

Now that the S90 has been released, besides the difference in MP's (4 vs 5), is there much of a difference between these two camera's? I kept thinking, if the Sony W5 had a charger it would be even better - perhaps the S90 is the answer to that, except for the MP.

Any comments or suggestions?? Am I putting too much emphasis on a charger??? I am using this as an everyday camera, to take hiking, vacations, family photos, etc.

dmz19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Apr 22, 2005, 3:21 PM   #2
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 61

My W1 came with a charger & 2 batteries (6 hour charge time mind you), the W5 does not? Surprising.
Pic-It is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2005, 5:51 PM   #3
Senior Member
CyberShotNut's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 673

Both of those cameras come with the same charger and batteries.
CyberShotNut is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:44 AM.