Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Sports & Action Photos

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 10, 2006, 12:47 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
tdgm1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 113
Default

Photo 2 Canon 30D 70-200 F2.8 Non IS F2.8 1/400 ISO 1250 Not processed
Attached Images
 
tdgm1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 10, 2006, 4:17 AM   #2
Super Moderator
 
Mark1616's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,397
Default

As with the first pic this is also under exposed so I have done a quick edit for you where I have boosted shadows and midtones. I have also reduced noise and then re-sized so I can post here.

Also it is a shame that the ball is not in shot as this would turn it into an interesting shot.

Keep on shooting and practise practise practise.

Mark
Attached Images
 
Mark1616 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2006, 6:53 AM   #3
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529
Default

The lack of a ball hurts the shot from a composition standpoint.

From a technical standpoint the underexposure ruins it. Mark did a decent job trying to correct the shot - but the correction illustrates a huge problem with underexposing: correcting the exposure brought out a LOT of noise. The amount of noise reduction applied removed too much detail (don't know if it was because so much noise was present or Mark just did a quick and dirty job of noise removal) - but when you look at the skin and the grass they both look like plastic.

You've GOT to get the exposure closer in-camera. No way is 1/400 ISO 1250 enough for most HS stadiums without a flash. This is again at least a stop underexposed.

Typically, unless it's an incredibly bright stadium I'm shooting 2.8, 1/400 and ISO 3200.

But, keep practicing. Getting a better exposure will be your biggest help. As for capturing peak action, that will come with time. That's the challenge with sports photography. Even if you nail everything technically (exposure, focus, tight framing) the image still has to be interesting to work well. That takes practice. Keep at it - you'll get there.
JohnG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2006, 6:57 AM   #4
Super Moderator
 
Mark1616's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,397
Default

John it was quick and very dirty noise reduction!!! I only used the most basic reduction in PSP which is to say the least crude. Just wanted to give a rough idea with this for TGDM to have a think about. I would suggest using on of the specific packages (as you know) such as noiseware, noise ninja, neat image etc.
Mark1616 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2006, 12:44 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
tdgm1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 113
Default

Thanks for the suggestions. Will increase the ISO. If continues what do I need to do to prevent underexposing????

Will also work on PP.


Will post other at another time.


Thanks again


TDGM
tdgm1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2006, 4:46 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
StevenC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 218
Default

Well you can't really go any lower to stop the action than 1/400 unless you are panning or have a monopod, but I reckon an ISO increase will be fine.

As a side - I go as low as 1/250 with my monopod braced when shooting soccer and although "moving" parts are blurred, it can create a nice image. Maybe give it a try?

If worst comes to worst, a bit of post production to brighten the image up coupled with a pass through a noise filter should hold you in good stead.
StevenC is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:34 PM.