Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Sports & Action Photos

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 5, 2008, 1:04 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 57
Default

Well at least you can call it that. I was at my local park trying out my new (used) Beercan lens with my Sony A100.

1/320s f/8.0 at 210.0mm iso100


1/400s f/8.0 at 105.0mm iso100


Tim
ZippyZX2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jul 5, 2008, 12:25 PM   #2
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529
Default

Faces, action and detail are things to keep in mind when shooting action. Not familiar with the beercan lens but the first shot is very soft - either an aspect of the lens, miss-focused or just overly cropped. If it's one of the latter two it is easily corrected (i.e. work on focus technique and ignore the urge to heavily crop). If it's the lens itself, nothing you can do about it. In any event, a different angle is preferable - you want to catch the face. It takes work to either position yourself properly or be patient for a turn.

The second shot has the same soft haze look to it. So, maybe it's the time of day (i.e. don't want to shoot early afternoon because haze / atmosphere are at their worst). I think it's a good idea to make a panoramic out of it so you don't have all the dead space but the lack of detail keeps it from being successful, IMO. Again, tight shots of the people on the tube with details of the spray and their facial expressions would be a good thing to try. Just remember, it has to be tight in-camera. You can't crop down and retain enough detail.

Keep at it and keep trying. You'll find if you do that and keep seeking good constructive feedback you'll get better every time out.
JohnG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 5, 2008, 11:52 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 57
Default

Is this what you mean by capturing thier face?

It was about 3pm and it was very hazy. I didn't use any filters.

1/500s f/8.0 at 210.0mm iso100


Bearcan lens - http://www.dyxum.com/lenses/detail.asp?IDLens=48

Tim
ZippyZX2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2008, 6:22 PM   #4
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529
Default

Tim,

Yes - that's better. Next question - was this last picture a crop or is that the original framing? If it's a crop, do you have the original framing?
JohnG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2008, 7:07 PM   #5
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 57
Default

Yes it is a crop. Here is a link to the full sized image. 10.2 megapixels.

http://www.pbase.com/zippyzx3/image/99779332/original

ZippyZX2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2008, 9:04 PM   #6
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529
Default

Tim,

That's what I thought. The problem with the lack of sharpness and detail is a result of you cropping so much.

As a generalguideline for human subjects you want the human subject filling 1/2 the frame in-camera. It's a guideline not a hard and fast rule. But when you crop as much as you did you just lose way too much detail.

Keep at it, and please keep that thought in mind when composing future action shots. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised how that one simple thing can greatly improve the quality of your results.

Good luck!
JohnG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 6, 2008, 11:11 PM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 57
Default

Thanks John,

This will have to do for me right now. Maybe someday(year) I'll have a fast APO at 400mm. I only had the 210mm on at the time. I do have a old Vivitar 100-400mm. But it is not a fast lens.

Tim
ZippyZX2 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:52 PM.