Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Sports & Action Photos

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 9, 2011, 6:19 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 74
Default not very happy.......

............first let me state that i did a ton of research on the nikon tele x 1.4-coupled with the d90 and the 70 200mm vr II most people were quite happy with very little IQ loss-so i decided to pull the trigger basically for more reach at the sons baseball games-i would give my left arm for the 300 2.8 prime, but hey i cant afford it- anyway i find that most of the images i take with the tele x on are very soft- ive dropped a stop from 4 to 4.5 thinking the images would be sharper but no go- heres a sample of a pic-its subpar for my take and i think others would agree- so basically im asking advice of others if i should just shoot the games without it? thanks-johnny
Attached Images
 
__________________
www.jg-photos.smugmug.com
hawksfan19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 9, 2011, 10:36 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Western Ma. USA
Posts: 795
Default

compare the 70-200 + 1.4x and just the 70-200, but cropped. See which you like better.







BTW, trading body parts are illegal in the U.S. I'd adivse against it. Also, it'd suck to have only one arm.
__________________
ewheeler20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2011, 4:05 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: "Sunny" Seattle
Posts: 390
Default

I had the same experience with the Canon equivalent. You could always look around for a used Sigma 100-300 F4. Steven
waoldrifleman is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.