|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 70
|
Hi all, noob poster here.
going on hols in a couple months and i'm wanting to get a good bridge. i've trawled loads of stuff and review sites, and i think i'm down to the above mentioned cameras. i'm going to vegas and related national parks, so there's be a ton of landcapey stuff and i'm hoping to try night sky pics at monument valley ~ tho i realise by their very nature a bridge isn't the best option for this, it's the only budget i have. far as i can tall, the Panny's top for IQ etc, the downside is the price, and things like extra batteries are a bit silly too. any opinions, thoughts or other suggestions would be greatly welcomed. TIA. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mount Shasta, California
Posts: 1,306
|
My two cents. I use the FZ150 and find its ease of use, high ISO, small size and continous shooting modes puts it ahead of the Fuji. The Fuji, however, has a mechanical zoom and a vast array of modes for many shooting situations including improving high ISO shots.
If size matters, go with the FZ150. There would be a much steeper learning curve with the Fuji, but once learned has the potential for good shooting. Check out this link to Amazon customer reviews for a discussion of shutter speed limits for the Fuji. Don't know how it applies as the writer doesn't specify what modes he is in. http://www.amazon.com/Fujifilm-FineP...owViewpoints=0 Note that niether of these cameras is a DSLR and will not give you that range of shooting options. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bangor,North Wales
Posts: 2,684
|
Hi Killerwolf...
With regards landscapes and such like,either should be fine- even the night shots if you use low iso settings and longer exposures. In my humble opinion,the Panny offers finer detail in its shots,with seemingly less noise reduction being applied- which might prove beneficial if you will be making large prints. The Panny' offers faster autofocus and much better video capture also. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 70
|
thanks very much for the replies.
seems the Panny's the one to go for, despite the cost. i was hoping the FZ200 might come out soon because usually previous models drop a little in price, other than that i'll just have to grit my teeth and pay up, lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bangor,North Wales
Posts: 2,684
|
Actually- the FZ200 has literally just come out,this weekend...!
So you might get lucky....! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 402
|
the fz150 is a great camera - the fz200 is yet untested by users. if you're going on a holiday, having a camera that's well known and liked might be a big plus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 70
|
thanks for the info. good point too about an established product over a new one. got a few weeks, i'll keep looking in the hopes the prices start to drop.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|