Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 1, 2004, 9:18 AM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1

I need a camera to fit into my pocket, simply because I never take photos with my SLR. I have reservations in regards to overall casio quality, but the ex-z55's size and battery life seem to be unique. It has been repeatedly suggested that Sony's 7.2 takes better pictures, with more pixels to a LCD (although samller) and better video quality-yet with larger physical size. Bust shots, weak flash, manual modes, etc. don't seem to bother me as much cause I am old school with my SLR if I need it.

Does anyone offer further suggestions that could lean me in any direction? From what I can read, the positives from both sides ultimately seems to negate each other overall. Thanks for your time, Scott
sjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 1, 2004, 1:01 PM   #2
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 47

Scott, I have the z55, Have had it for about 5 weeks, I have taken lots of pictures with it and find that I carry it much more than I would have my old canon s40. The pictures look a liitle worse than my old camera but it's not that noticable. So far I think it will be a fun camera for the point and shoot stuff. I don't know about the other camera you mentioned, never seen it. Ron
kazman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 3, 2004, 1:50 AM   #3
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 25

The Casios do take pretty grainy pictures. I'd go with the Sony.

Well, if image quality is what you want,. I'd actually recommend the Casio SD200/300.


DigiCamMan is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:24 AM.