Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Xtreme Makeover

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 1, 2006, 5:25 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 51
Default

Hello all,

After some success with restoring a couple of old photos, I was recently asked by a friend to try another repair job. Of course I agreed without actually seeing it - big mistake!!This one is way beyond my skill level; I been trying for hours to fix it, and not made much progress.

The problem with the photo seems to be that the chemicals and colours seem to be degrading in some areas. The damage between arms and body is easy enough to repair by cloning and the like, but the head area is another matter!

I wondered if the best way to proceed would be to select the baby, then cut and paste it to a different background, but I can't even make an accurate selection around the baby.

And is there a way to select all the degraded areas and change them to, well... something better!?

Any help or advice would be most welcome,

Regards from Steve in Wales.


Attached Images
 
steveasub is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 2, 2006, 7:27 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
creeduk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 365
Default

You have a lot of work here but you already know that. Make sure your scan is high resolution to give you th most to play with. You can also try scanning in color to get some channel information. Duplicate the image and change mode to multiply you will see some more detail come through. Now you have a long slow job of healing and cloning. If they have more shots from the same session it may be possible to rescue details from those shots, especially background details.
creeduk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2, 2006, 6:58 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 51
Default

Hi Creeduk, thanks for the reply.

The picture is 4 inches by 6 inches, what scan resolution would you suggest? Sadly there are no others from the same shoot to borrow from.

Would you try to cut and paste the baby into a new background?

Regards, Steve
steveasub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2, 2006, 8:39 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
VTphotog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 4,212
Default

This is certainly a challenge, but there are ways to clean it up. In the old days, touchups were done with an airbrush, and that is what I used here, for the most part. I did clone the right ear and move it, with some adjustmets, to the left side of his head. The rest was done with airbrush. Since it's monochrome, just set brush to black, and adjust tranparency and edge softness as needed in different areas.

brian
Attached Images
 
VTphotog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2, 2006, 9:32 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Corpsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 879
Default

I don't think there's really anything you can do to actually recover the detail lost in those weird chemical stains, it seems the best thing is to just darken those areas by painting. I also increased the contrast with a curves adjustment here.
Attached Images
 
Corpsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2, 2006, 10:34 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
creeduk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 365
Default

I would go as high as you can, you can resize the resolution afterwards, but give your self plenty of canvas. 300ppi /dpi is 1:1 so at least 600.
creeduk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 3, 2006, 6:03 AM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 85
Default

I tried to find what little detail there was to "enhance" I think I am pretty close to the actual outline of the head and shoulders. However, I did place the left ear a little too high (didn't notice until I had already merged the layer). I thought a vintage wallpaper would help it out. (After the ear incident I decided against trying to recover the floor lamp)


Attached Images
 
CanonFodder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 8, 2006, 3:38 PM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 62
Default



This one took a good half-hour. Too bad you don't have a higher-res version.

curtis



Attached Images
 
curtisfun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 12, 2006, 12:36 PM   #9
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 51
Default

Sorry I haven't replied sooner, but thanks for all the advice and good efforts at fixing this almost lost cause!

I posted a low resolution scan of the picture because of the forumlimitations of not exceeding 250400 bytes. Have I gone wrong somewhere?

If anyone is really keen to have a go at repairing this, I'll happily e-mail a photo of whatever resolution is required.

Regards,

Steve
steveasub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2006, 3:50 PM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 51
Default

This is what I came up with after several hours of head scratching trial and error!


Attached Images
 
steveasub is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:09 AM.