View Single Post
Old Oct 22, 2009, 10:57 AM   #272
Senior Member
TCav's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,683

Originally Posted by Chato View Post
I really don't care if the guy hasn't gotten the latest Sears Catalogue. The only relevant question is harm to the child! And that doesn't happen from these situations.
I agree. The act of photographing a child, in and of itself, does not harm the child, but some other person may or may not consider the possibility that the photogrrapher may have an evil purpose in mind. And they may pass along their suspicions to the police, and the police may investigate. Not because the person took a photo, but because the person looked suspicious while doing so.
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline