Originally Posted by Chato
I really don't care if the guy hasn't gotten the latest Sears Catalogue. The only relevant question is harm to the child! And that doesn't happen from these situations.
I agree. The act of photographing a child, in and of itself, does not harm the child, but some other person may or may not consider the possibility that the photogrrapher may have an evil purpose in mind. And they may pass along their suspicions to the police, and the police may investigate. Not because the person took a photo, but because the person looked suspicious while doing so.