View Single Post
Old Oct 31, 2009, 12:08 PM   #17
NHL
Senior Member
 
NHL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,567
Default

That's not what I meant...

The 24-105 that you listed as example with IS practically trails the old Sigma 24-70 in all areas (from distortion, vignetting to CA), and not just sharpness:
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/18...review?start=1
http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/31...review?start=1

They need to do better than this with their new lens (IS just makes it harder) - Theses points are already well taken in others Nikon forums
-> Sony got it right... their optical path is the simplest (i.e. no IS)

Last edited by NHL; Oct 31, 2009 at 12:25 PM.
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote