View Single Post
Old Dec 19, 2010, 11:51 AM   #10
mtclimber
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

peterbj-

I find the performance of the SD4000 at high ISO settings to be quite good. Check out the link below. It would be incorrect to compare the S95 to the SD4000, as the S95 has a much larger imager, though they both have F 2.0 lenses.

I opted from the SD4000 as it was more budget compatible than the S95. All in all I have been impressed with the SD4000's performance.

This photo was taken on the run at ISO 1600, and I am impressed with the result:

http://anchorse.smugmug.com/Other/Ca...3_KdY5g-XL.jpg

Sarah Joyce
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote